Re: Way too much automated email on this list
Vít Ondruch via devel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dne 04. 08. 26 v 20:25 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch via devel wrote: >> I am not a fan of this change. >> >> Anyway, if you did that, then you probably want to do the same for: >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/GEPLBPSANBD2ZNRIW74A4YUSZKNYNMIB/ >> >> because without the compose report, it is out of place. > Why? It's asking for people to test... I think thats still desired/this > is the right place for it. > > kevin This is asking what people? Me? If yes, then it failed to be successful. Judging by me, the compose report can have value for every subscriber of devel, because it is kind of the heartbeat of Fedora, reporting all updates. But I don't have idea to whom this one is directed, but my guess is that it is quite limited subset of those who might be interested in compose report. And I asked this question, because all the reports comes from [email protected]. Removing the filter I had setup previously and creating new one for the compose report, this email suddenly falls into different folder. Vít P.S. I am grumpy about this change, because to keep receiving the compose report, I have to expose myself to more email then previously. I had to subscribe to ML and I had to setup more filter. This is certainly change for worse for myself and I doubt we will ever see any (measurable) benefit from removing this email from this ML. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEjuEMC4xF8PxsGhoUDOCe55kXuHwFAmp0P98FAwAAAAAACgkQDOCe55kXuHzd 0A/8D7ipHO5VHC7RpQh8TStDto+/And9dOhz1UoVaDbOah0FeCLg/iBmQIZpbtdPCwB6K4Y0xro0 qqN2orooq2ttG/Ejnvv54kq0qGQktz1w3o1kJK/fQV2Lt5oNWLiuq5VTP7oAR9bFgLp/Z+tQFV9c YQCVfAhRKr6SxCx++TLgmW4TrYjPbMIKoDt9pppmo7SG66LqevCjImGdHT6s0NljIo63vwdFFdQW KCVWX5dTbjG/7CvqpSSsp3V5Ou3J3xUVmwtg9vkh2LVz/CmoSXs0yfN2T/EjDE3moM5RKWBwptrj HI8CG8UFTs4qlzL4WUgYb85hM3jHjYERdAkMorDM7RjXoy5LqgWnYzIecEdaH7Iy7tiFQsaMSU+T rT+FtoWEaw7PpzgdSvSjfYt14yYntHbgz8Yy0megZbUYBNHLRktpw4XQVded5dCdfqkeJgvvnYtT PJSMX7//iEjaQQiU5B/o/6+FX3y9cx8W4VKqSNrCK/8CI9WjpAXVzW0Wm6iIP/cTdhU31sBLn1mE CIwbhWuj0wzbi0CdaIYicJ2UT/+gsuqck5O/5iwx31IXXT3y06GQCNudbsvp2QW71yFb2FAzRYAr kmKSwAKEEu127an2XWyikRQ6R21RxOqR9FsLpRXiSFWrcSth49NiKelBGLuPNt2vSDBEeQejfOj+ bk4= =qVzG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----