Re: service file permissions breaking due to file 5.47 / redhat-rpm-config

Em qui., 13 de ago. de 2026, 18:08, Barry <[email protected]> escreveu:

>
>
> > On 13 Aug 2026, at 20:46, Mateus R. Costa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > * .service files are effectively based on .ini syntax, so it makes a lot
> of sense they are are recognized as .ini files
>
> I think you are conflating the syntax of a files content with the
> semantics of a files content.
>
> In which case .services files are not .ini files right?
>
> Barry
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new


Sure, but think about it this way:
A .ini file is a specific type of a plain text file.
A systemd unit file is a ini-like file.

Depending on how the mime type detection logic runs it makes a lot of sense
that eventually a systemd unit file gets detected as a ini.

So why not estabilish a "systemd unit file mime type" for specifically this
scenario instead of relying on the plain text mime type now that we know
the possibility of this problem?

Thanks for your time,
Mateus Rodrigues Costa

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new