Re: s390x builder outage
Fabio Valentini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB-QmhTKmWhZff8HU_vwtXEXpCRPVz2jNHV0bX0xVTA6fXnVHw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 4:38 PM Chris Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> said: > > When there are idle builders available, then ppc64le builders appear > > to be slightly slower than s390x. > > But when all s390x builders are busy, they become the bottleneck, both > > in terms of wait time (time until a build is assigned to an s390x > > builder) *and* build time (more builds running on the same hardware?). > > That sounds like maybe too many parallel builds are being sent to the > same hardware, which I would think would be easy to adjust. Not really, no ... provisioning fewer builders to the same hardware just makes the bottleneck worse (fewer builders available). From what I can tell, the current setup (number of builders / available hardware) is pretty much the best that can be done - without actually getting more hardware. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new