Re: dnf messages when installing recent fc44 kernels
Samuel Sieb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/29/26 10:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I upgraded fc42->fc44 a few days ago. > > This shows up at the end of each kernel update: > >>>> Running %posttrans scriptlet: kernel-core-0:7.0.9-205.fc44.x86_64 >>>> Finished %posttrans scriptlet: kernel-core-0:7.0.9-205.fc44.x86_64 >>>> Scriptlet output: >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 >>>> requested by '/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o' >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o' >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 >>>> requested by '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o' >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o' >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 >>>> requested by '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o' >>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10' >>>> dracut[E]: FAILED: /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-install -D /var/tmp/ >>>> dracut.dmOI579/initramfs -a -l -f /lib64/libssl.so /lib64/ >>>> libssl.so.1.0.2o /lib64/libssl.so.1.1 /lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1q / >>>> lib64/libssl.so.10 /lib64/libssl.so.3 /lib64/libssl.so.3.5.5 /usr/ >>>> lib64/libssl.so /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o /usr/lib64/ >>>> libssl.so.1.1 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1q /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 / >>>> usr/lib64/libssl.so.3 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.3.5.5 /lib/libssl.so / >>>> lib/libssl.so.1.0.2o /lib/libssl.so.1.1 /lib/libssl.so.1.1.1q /lib/ >>>> libssl.so.10 /lib/libssl.so.3 /lib/libssl.so.3.5.5 /usr/lib/ >>>> libssl.so /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.2o /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1 /usr/lib/ >>>> libssl.so.1.1.1q /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 /usr/ >>>> lib/libssl.so.3.5.5 > > The system boots OK, however I would like to resolve the issue. > > I think that it is due to some old cruft still installed on this server. > The source of the requesting libs seems to be > compat-openssl10-1:1.0.2o-9.fc32.x86_64 > which is ... old ... > > Maybe this is some old ssl packages that are not needed and can be removed? > > $ sudo dnf remove compat-openssl10 openssl1.1 > Package Arch > Version Repository Size > Removing: > compat-openssl10 i686 > 1:1.0.2o-9.fc32 fedora 2.6 MiB > compat-openssl10 x86_64 > 1:1.0.2o-9.fc32 fedora 2.9 MiB > openssl1.1 i686 > 1:1.1.1q-4.fc38 fedora 3.5 MiB > openssl1.1 x86_64 > 1:1.1.1q-4.fc38 fedora 3.7 MiB > Removing dependent packages: > bind-export-libs x86_64 > 32:9.11.14-2.fc30 updates 3.3 MiB > libc-client x86_64 > 0:2007f-25.fc32 fedora 1.5 MiB > virtuoso-opensource x86_64 > 2:6.1.6-7.fc22 <unknown> 13.0 MiB > Removing unused dependencies: > openldap-compat x86_64 > 0:2.6.13-1.fc44 fedora 42.3 KiB > > Is it safe to remove these? I hope so. They're all really old packages except the one compat package that nothing else is using. -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new