Re: dnf messages when installing recent fc44 kernels

On 30/5/26 17:03, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/29/26 10:19 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> I upgraded fc42->fc44 a few days ago.
>>
>> This shows up at the end of each kernel update:
>>
>>>>> Running %posttrans scriptlet: kernel-core-0:7.0.9-205.fc44.x86_64
>>>>> Finished %posttrans scriptlet: kernel-core-0:7.0.9-205.fc44.x86_64
>>>>> Scriptlet output:
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 requested by '/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o'
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o'
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 requested by '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o'
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o'
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libcrypto.so.10 requested by '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o'
>>>>> dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10'
>>>>> dracut[E]: FAILED: /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-install -D /var/tmp/ dracut.dmOI579/initramfs -a -l -f /lib64/libssl.so /lib64/ libssl.so.1.0.2o /lib64/libssl.so.1.1 /lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1q / lib64/libssl.so.10 /lib64/libssl.so.3 /lib64/libssl.so.3.5.5 /usr/ lib64/libssl.so /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.2o /usr/lib64/ libssl.so.1.1 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1q /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 / usr/lib64/libssl.so.3 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.3.5.5 /lib/libssl.so / lib/libssl.so.1.0.2o /lib/libssl.so.1.1 /lib/libssl.so.1.1.1q /lib/ libssl.so.10 /lib/libssl.so.3 /lib/libssl.so.3.5.5 /usr/lib/ libssl.so /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.2o /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1 /usr/lib/ libssl.so.1.1.1q /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 /usr/ lib/libssl.so.3.5.5
>>
>> The system boots OK, however I would like to resolve the issue.
>>
>> I think that it is due to some old cruft still installed on this server.
>> The source of the requesting libs seems to be
>>      compat-openssl10-1:1.0.2o-9.fc32.x86_64
>> which is ... old ...
>>
>> Maybe this is some old ssl packages that are not needed and can be removed?
>>
>> $ sudo dnf remove compat-openssl10 openssl1.1
>> Package                          Arch Version                          Repository            Size
>> Removing:
>>   compat-openssl10                i686 1:1.0.2o-9.fc32                  fedora             2.6 MiB
>>   compat-openssl10                x86_64 1:1.0.2o-9.fc32                  fedora             2.9 MiB
>>   openssl1.1                      i686 1:1.1.1q-4.fc38                  fedora             3.5 MiB
>>   openssl1.1                      x86_64 1:1.1.1q-4.fc38                  fedora             3.7 MiB
>> Removing dependent packages:
>>   bind-export-libs                x86_64 32:9.11.14-2.fc30                updates            3.3 MiB
>>   libc-client                     x86_64 0:2007f-25.fc32                  fedora             1.5 MiB
>>   virtuoso-opensource             x86_64 2:6.1.6-7.fc22                   <unknown>         13.0 MiB
>> Removing unused dependencies:
>>   openldap-compat                 x86_64 0:2.6.13-1.fc44                  fedora            42.3 KiB
>>
>> Is it safe to remove these? I hope so.
> 
> They're all really old packages except the one compat package that nothing else is using.

Thanks. Of course, but my question was more specific: Is it safe to remove these?
In other words, will the system be OK without these?
I expect that if I later NEED to reinstall these, the packages my very well not be available.

-- 
Eyal at Home ([email protected])
-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new