Re: Minor issues with update problem from 43 to 44 (sslcacert)

"Michael D. Setzer II via users" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6 Jun 2026 at 10:59, Todd Zullinger wrote:

Date sent:	Sat, 6 Jun 2026 10:59:09 -0400
From:	Todd Zullinger <[email protected]>
To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: Minor issues with update problem from 43 to 44 (sslcacert)
Send reply to:	Community support for Fedora users <[email protected]>

> Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Had done an upgrade on a machine a little while ago, and had to 
> > make some manual changes to two of my repo files involving 
> > sslcacert lines. Just updated another system, and had to again 
> > manually do changes. First line is the new line in fc44 and old line 
> > in fc43.
> > 
> > < sslcacert=/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/tls-ca-bundle.pem
> >> sslcacert=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
> > 
> > The differences also have changing from 43 to 44 on some, but also 
> > have to update that will winehq repo, 
> > 
> > So, is this something that just needs to be done manually, or should 
> > the update from 43 to 44 do this. 
> > 
> > Recall originally finding this info, but don't recall exactly where.
> > The speedtest isn't a big deal, but the TurboVNC causes the VNC 
> > not to work correctly, and requires an ssh login to fix it.
> > 
> > What would be best to report it?
> 
> This is the result of this Fedora 44 change:
> 
>     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/droppingOfCertPemFile

Thanks for info. Think I had found that when I did the original 
update test and found these two repos no longer worked until I 
manually changed the paths.
ookla_speedtest-cli.repo
TurboVNC.repo

I did just comment the lines, and did a dnf clean all; dnf update and 
it seemed to run with no error. 
Assume both repos had the line from something that had told them. 
Why do the have the sslcacert= option if it isn't needed?

Thanks.

> 
> While you could update those paths, the better move is to
> drop sslcacert from the repo files.  Only third-party repos
> add them but they should not be doing so.  It is a pointless
> waste of everyone's time.  The default value for sslcacert
> in dnf is to use the system default.
> 
> If you've modified these repo files for other reasons, then
> you should fix them to drop the entirely unneeded and
> unwanted sslcacert too.  If you don't need to modify them
> for other reasons, you should simply install the packaged
> default from the repo, whatever it is and then let it be
> managed by the third-party repo.
> 
> If there are third-party repo files which specify the old
> path, you should notify them that they should remove the
> sslcacert entry entirely and use the perfectly good default.
> 
> -- 
> Todd
> 


+------------------------------------------------------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)     
 mailto:[email protected]                            
 mailto:[email protected]
 mailto:[email protected]
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins                        
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+



-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.