Re: dnf remove question

ToddAndMargo via users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/14/26 6:29 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> On this bug I posted
> 
> xfce4-screensaver idle/lock failure after xscreensaver removal
> due to orphaned autostart desktop entries
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488676
> 
> The closed won't fix response was:
> 
>     "dnf remove" are not expected to touch user directory. It
>     can happen that user needs to do some "cleanup" manually.
> 
> Am I being "blown off" or is this actually the case?  If not
> the sue, why lease the system entries too?  It feels
> like a blow off.
> 
> Yours in Confusion,
> -T
> 
> I took me five pages of questions and answers with ChatGPT
> to narrow down the problem.  Not funny to screw the user
> like this.


It just occurred to me that if it in not "dnf remove's"
responsibility to remove thing out the user's directories,
why did it put them there when it did "dnf install"
in the first place.

This feels more and more like a blow off.
-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.