Re: dnf remove question
ToddAndMargo via users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/14/26 7:12 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/14/26 6:29 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> On this bug I posted >> >> xfce4-screensaver idle/lock failure after xscreensaver removal >> due to orphaned autostart desktop entries >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488676 >> >> The closed won't fix response was: >> >> "dnf remove" are not expected to touch user directory. It >> can happen that user needs to do some "cleanup" manually. >> >> Am I being "blown off" or is this actually the case? If not >> the sue, why lease the system entries too? It feels >> like a blow off. > > I have no idea what the second line is supposed to say. > > dnf does not touch user directories ever on install or remove. > I assume that xscreensaver itself sets up the autostart entry when it > runs. I don't see how that autostart entry would block another > screensaver when the program doesn't even exist. > Maybe Xfce is doing it. It would have to read /etc/xdg/autostart/xscreensaver-autostart.desktop which "remove" did not remove. -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new