Re: F44/Xfce - Asunder CD ripper change
Samuel Sieb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/17/26 7:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 6/16/26 8:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz via users wrote: >>> mp3 for both. But I suspect something new in metadata. >>> So I probably need some tool that can compare metadata >>> between the two versions. Other than what shows up in VLC >>> Info on the files. >> >> id3v2 -l file.mp3 > > I'd suggest eyeD3 or mid3v2 rather than id3v2. The latter > fails to parse many valid ID3 tags, for me. Where did you get those from? They don't appear to be in Fedora (at least the F43 I'm using now). The only cli one I found with a search was "id3v2". There are a few graphical ones as well. > I tried it on a few of mine for curiosity, as I hadn't used > it in a decade. None of them worked; id3v2 fails with "No > ID3 tag" for anything I've encoded over the past several > years. > > (I know that's not the case as I've got a more meticulously > maintained set of tags than normal people. :) > > It may be that id3v2 is unable to parse Xing/MP3 Info > headers or VBR encoded files, I didn't dig into it. Since > it had the last commit around 2010, I'd call it moribund, at > best. It's only for id3 format tags. If you're using something else, then the message is correct. It works for the files I've made recently, showing both the v1 and v2 tags. (I normally use ogg, but my car audio system doesn't do well with that, so I copy to mp3 for there.) -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new