Re: latest mariadb-connector-c 3.4.9 breaks mythtv
[email protected] Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:46:05 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Michal, On 30/6/26 00:12, Michal Schorm wrote: > So far you are the only voice I've heard, which does not convince me - > yet - to take such dire measures. Here is someone else: http://lists.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/2026-June/416823.html See how bad it was for this person. There are probably others that are not heard from, and as people update, more will encounter a total loss of mythtv. Maybe other packages have a similar issue? > There are no BZ tickets on this topic, no discussion.fp.o threads etc. > related to this issue. This is my original GitHub issue where I encountered the issue. https://github.com/MythTV/mythtv/issues/1397 The issue is now abandoned after it was understood that it is not mythtv's fault. > My plan was to merge the PR and put it to BODHI with automatic > push-to-stable disabled so I could gather substantially more feedback > on it. > I just haven't got a peer review on the PR yet. Since the fix is more > my "best effort" than something I am able to test thoroughly myself, I > definitely want a second engineering opinion on it. I agree that deep testing is required. It is well known that fixes have more bugs than software in general. However, pulling this version is safe to do, until a fixed replacement is established. > Until then, it would be great if you could test the scratch builds > I've provided you with. (by installing the packages downloaded right > from the Koji build system) I understand you but, as I said, I am not in a position to fiddle with my system now. > I've also haven't reported it upstream just yet (it already has one > upstream tracker opened), as I want to get a better sense of how > severe the issue actually is in practice and how many people are > affected. > > > Michal Eyal > -- > > Michal Schorm > Senior Software Engineer > Databases Team > Red Hat > > -- > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 3:49 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Michal, >> >> Looking at the fedora 44 status at >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mariadb-connector-c >> I see this connector was not un-pushed and no new replacement was provided. >> Doing 'dnf update' (after I downgraded) the bad version is still offered. >> >> Seeing the severity of the problem (I am not the only one encountering it) should it still be offered? >> >> Regards, >> Eyal >> >> On 28/6/26 23:02, Michal Schorm wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am the maintainer of the package 'mariadb-connector-c'. >>> I am sorry for your issue, thanks for letting me know. >>> >>> I analyzed your issue based on your description. It seems to be an >>> unfortunate regression in the upstream code that causes the temporal >>> data type to be stored with zero length, resulting in the symptoms you >>> are observing. >>> >>> I will need MariaDB upstream to verify this and create a proper fix. >>> Until then, I attempted to create a downstream patch: >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb-connector-c/pull-request/27 >>> >>> Could you please test the PR scratch build and check whether it solves >>> the issue for you? >>> Rawhide scratch build: >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=147147264 >>> F44 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=147147459 >>> >>> >>> Michal >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Michal Schorm >>> Senior Software Engineer >>> Databases Team >>> Red Hat >>> >>> -- >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 1:35 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This version picked by my server today. fc44 on x86_64. >>>> >>>> I do not know what is responsible but downgrading to 3.4.8 solved the problem. >>>> >>>> Maybe a clash between rpmfusion and fedora? >>>> >>>> It looks like it may me a major problem with handling date/time. All "Previously Recorded" show a date in 2106... >>>> >>>> MythWeb, which directly accesses the db, works just fine. myth:6544 has the problems, as does mythfrontend, and likely mythbackend (no recording made). >>>> Status shows "no upcoming". >>>> >>>> All schedules show start/end of 00:00:00. No "Program Guide" data showing. No "Upcoming" (natch), and more. >>>> >>>> This update was in stable for two days now but I do not see any mention, maybe it is something else on my server? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Eyal at Home ([email protected]) >>>> >>>> -- >> -- >> Eyal at Home ([email protected]) >> > -- Eyal at Home ([email protected]) -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new