Re: Selinux for RAMFS implementation
Ashish Mishra <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.selinux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP2OjcjJNt69xraqBHodCsFQDjzcpHd+3Sa82xvtQvFwOD9v_A@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Ondrej ,
Thanks for sharing valuable information.
1) Since it's in an evaluation state , we might have a chance to look at
tmpfs options .
*Can you please share some pointers on this option ?*
2) Worst case scenario , if we can't go ahead with a tmpfs approach ..
a) Are there any specific files / directories or services that might
create a problem ?
Or if
b) Any way we can customize STOCK fedora policies ( so that they can
work with RAMFS)
( *I can sense that this option might be complex , time-consuming
& risky *.
But in case ramfs is mandatory , at-least we will know the
effort & plan schedule accordingly )
Thanks for sharing the comment as it has definitely saved us some time &
will help us to use Fedora in a better way .
Thanks ,
Ashish Kumar Mishra
_______________________________________________
selinux mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]