Re: Selinux for RAMFS implementation

Ashish Mishra <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.selinux
Message-ID <CAP2OjcjJNt69xraqBHodCsFQDjzcpHd+3Sa82xvtQvFwOD9v_A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ondrej ,

Thanks for sharing valuable information.

1) Since it's in an evaluation state , we might have a chance to look at
tmpfs options .
    *Can you please share  some pointers on this option ?*


2) Worst case scenario , if we can't go ahead with a tmpfs approach ..
    a) Are there any specific files / directories or services that might
create a problem ?
          Or if
    b) Any way we can customize STOCK fedora policies ( so that they can
work with RAMFS)
        (  *I can sense that this option might be complex , time-consuming
& risky *.
           But in case ramfs is mandatory , at-least we will know the
effort & plan schedule accordingly )


Thanks for sharing the comment as it has definitely saved us some time &
will help us to use Fedora in a better way .


Thanks ,
Ashish Kumar Mishra

_______________________________________________
selinux mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.