Re: selinux-policy package versioning change
justina colmena ~biz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.selinux,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and deployment not only to Fedora on the deskop, but to various distributions of "CentOS" or commercial installations of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) "in the cloud" especially on OpenVZ or other shared-kernel virtualization technologies as the case may be for businesses and end users who might otherwise benefit from SELinux Mandatory Access Control policies built in to the Linux kernel. On Monday, March 29, 2021 11:56:23 AM AKDT Zdenek Pytela wrote: > Hi, > > We plan to change the versioning scheme of the selinux-policy packages. > > Based on a request to using tags in selinux-policy github repo, we > discussed further actions and possible automation and decided to couple the > tags with the package version, together with making a change for better > comprehensibility. > > So far, the package version changed with branching a new Fedora release off > rawhide (e. g. 3.14.6 to 3.14.7), and the release part of the NVR scheme > was used for updates (3.14.7-1). After the change, the version would > contain the Fedora branch number and the sequential number of the package > in the branch (34.1), and the release part would be used only for changes > in packaging (34.1-1). It would apply to Fedora 34 and newer. > > In github repo, tags matching the Fedora package version would be used > (v34.1), pairing the latest commit in github with the latest commit in the > package (34.1-1). > > We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless the > exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will make > the change in a week time. > > Cheers, _______________________________________________ selinux mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 659 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCAAdFiEEJ+tDHJ8GMkLUn/9+/oAFjz6HEVUFAmBiOwIACgkQ/oAFjz6H EVUBKAwAspKlauClmT87Agqq1I53yVDSTALCKYDNxq3ukAzlGftmAxbWrBLL5yQ9 pZCFGWy0ssF6vIYnvTT69chDZfrHXueL3OmSpd3P/DkHCZC3SoB8RONChV93rOtc NTP5A0bu3fqAhbHW6E5rpSazF7BlxY3iaWw7VewxlRlS0diLarrjNOIxaH3b7RXo FHFxnJkgt3Lo0UCu6SydJpWHzdgEvporjjiOF1cPMIAZhur7RvWIpIWDcnDsuYpY pUuTC96qajlp0xXZQ5gPOa7pKO0EAxFufSuPuUku9DnVkzBeLZd/DgEmujU7X+jQ fXIwgJJd8M2kKFZ71jvyd8HOqkDmtc5tbybRzpm8s2l+5kOYpb2E7gWI2+4eI1WW nav67ovyuqzX+DThlfkKUBZ2y1Oy34z1Cq9T3TFxBjA2KwOn7Q77GT6oflM3GtIH xXYczJGDcxn45vB/EebvquvTuuf/ZRGzEzW1UdoHwOKgaqMJy/TTs/XN2rD0LF9t IsI1SB1B =Y7Ea -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----