Re: selinux-policy package versioning change

justina colmena ~biz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.selinux,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy 
"development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and 
deployment not only to Fedora on the deskop, but to various distributions of 
"CentOS" or commercial installations of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) "in 
the cloud" especially on OpenVZ or other shared-kernel virtualization 
technologies as the case may be for businesses and end users who might 
otherwise benefit from SELinux Mandatory Access Control policies built in to 
the Linux kernel.

On Monday, March 29, 2021 11:56:23 AM AKDT Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We plan to change the versioning scheme of the selinux-policy packages.
> 
> Based on a request to using tags in selinux-policy github repo, we
> discussed further actions and possible automation and decided to couple the
> tags with the package version, together with making a change for better
> comprehensibility.
> 
> So far, the package version changed with branching a new Fedora release off
> rawhide (e. g. 3.14.6 to 3.14.7), and the release part of the NVR scheme
> was used for updates (3.14.7-1). After the change, the version would
> contain the Fedora branch number and the sequential number of the package
> in the branch (34.1), and the release part would be used only for changes
> in packaging (34.1-1). It would apply to Fedora 34 and newer.
> 
> In github repo, tags matching the Fedora package version would be used
> (v34.1), pairing the latest commit in github with the latest commit in the
> package (34.1-1).
> 
> We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless the
> exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will make
> the change in a week time.
> 
> Cheers,

_______________________________________________
selinux mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 659 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Y7Ea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.