Re: openQA test failures for Rawhide - sorry

Derek Enz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID <CAF4eBFWddN6yJgP283zj126HWuyehvZ6EeG1mwUMZtUkmZjJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Good to know. Thank you!

Derek Enz

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 7:51 AM Justin Forbes <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 2:57 AM Adam Williamson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
> > updates.
> >
> > Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something
> > in the kernel.
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0b8ce0290c (kernel-
> > 6.16.0-0.rc5.45.fc43) was gated because of these weird failures. But
> > then the perl 5.42 side tag landed, and python3-perf - which is built
> > from the kernel - became uninstallable, so we tagged in the kernel from
> > the perl side tag to fix that...which turns out to be that same kernel-
> > 6.16.0-0.rc5.65.fc43 . Oops. So we can have:
> >
> > 1) a kernel which doesn't cause weird failures in openQA, but an
> > uninstallable python3-perf which breaks all sorts of common build
> > chains and installs
> >
> > 2) an installable python3-perf, but weird openQA failures
> >
> > I can't find another choice right now :( So we're stuck.
> >
> > The openQA failures come along with a ton of warning kernel traces
> > about DRM stuff, which are apparently fixed by
> >
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/#me2a0f3254a57cdd157ba79344ab8d51476ba18e5
> > , but I don't know if fixing those tracebacks will actually fix the
> > test failures, or if that's some other issue. Also, that patch is not
> > yet merged to mainline, so just doing a newer kernel snapshot build
> > won't pull it in.
>
> I have been tracking that patch and it has been merged to linux-next.
> I have it sitting here (and currently in rawhide) waiting for a build
> to test it.
>
> > Kernel builds were failing anyway due to a dracut bug -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379116 . I've just
> > bisected that and sent a dracut build with the offending commit
> > reverted, so we can build kernels again, but I'm not going to try and
> > do any kernel builds (I can't anyway as I'm not on the SB signing
> > list).
>
> I tried a kernel build this morning and we are still getting dracut
> 107-1 in the build root.
>
> Justin
>
> > In the morning I'll see if fiddling with the openQA settings to use a
> > different graphics adapter mitigates the problem, unless Justin's got a
> > new kernel build through and it fixes the problem, or something. Until
> > then, F43 updates will likely fail gating. Sorry for the inconvenience
> > :(
> > --
> > Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
> > Fedora QA
> > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected]
> > https://www.happyassassin.net
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> test mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

-- 
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.