Re: F44 update problems

On 2/25/26 1:29 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:23 AM Adam Williamson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2026-02-25 at 12:11 -0500, Robert McBroom via test wrote:
>>> Update on f44 fails to build initramfs.
>>>
>>>     Running scriptlet: kernel-uki-virt-6.19.3-300.fc44.x86_64
>>>                      56/56
>>> Error: /boot/initramfs-6.19.2-300.fc44.x86_64.img not found.
>>> /usr/lib/kernel/install.d/95-set-boot-entry.install failed with exit
>>> status 1.
>>> warning: %posttrans(kernel-uki-virt-6.19.3-300.fc44.x86_64) scriptlet
>>> failed, exit status 1
>>>
>>> Error in POSTTRANS scriptlet in rpm package kernel-uki-virt
>>>     Running scriptlet: kernel-modules-6.19.3-300.fc44.x86_64
>>>                     56/56
>>>     Running scriptlet: kernel-core-6.19.3-300.fc44.x86_64
>>>                56/56
>>> grep: /var/tmp/dracut.dW7oPRz/initramfs/etc/shadow: No such file or
>>> directory
>>> dracut-install: ERROR: could not locate dependency libnsl.so.2 requested
>>> by '/var/tmp/dracut.dW7oPRz/initramfs/usr/lib64/libnss_nis.so.2.0.0'
>>> xargs: /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-install: exited with status 255; aborting
>>> dracut[F]: Resolving executable dependencies failed
>>> /usr/lib/kernel/install.d/50-dracut.install failed with exit status 1.
>>> warning: %posttrans(kernel-core-6.19.3-300.fc44.x86_64) scriptlet
>>> failed, exit status 1
>>>
>>> Error in POSTTRANS scriptlet in rpm package kernel-core
>>>     Running scriptlet: ed-1.22.4-2.fc44.x86_64
>>>       56/56
>>> Error: Could not run transaction.
>> Can you file a bug for this against the kernel package? Thanks!
>>
>> Do you know why kernel-uki-virt is installed, BTW? I think the -uki-
>> kernels generally shouldn't be installed unless you manually installed
>> them...but there might be something I don't know about.
>>
>> CCing jforbes for info.
> No, the UKI packages should not be installed unless specifically
> requested.  Any kernel post bugs should not be filed against the
> kernel, all the kernel does is call kernel-install which is a part of
> systemd. Bugs should typically be filed there unless the issue is
> clearly in dracut.
>
> As for failing to build the initramfs, this is definitely failing in
> dracut. It may well be related to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2440160
>

The dependency is missing. Copied the  lib64 files

   libnslibnslrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root        17 Jul 23  2025 libcbor.so.0.12 -> libcbor.so.0.12.0
   -rwxr-xr-x.   1 root root     74400 Jul 23  2025 libcbor.so.0.12.0
l  lrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root        18 Jan 15  2025 libfuse3.so.3 -> libfuse3.so.3.16.2
   -rwxr-xr-x.   1 root root    261680 Jan 15  2025 libfuse3.so.3.16.2
    lrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root        15 Jul 23  2025 libnsl.so.2 -> libnsl.so.3.0.0
   -rwxr-xr-x.   1 root root     32672 Jul 23  2025 libnsl.so.3.0.0

   from a f43 installation and the initramfs builds


-- 
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new