Re: FAILED SMART self-check

Robert Canary <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As I said I *removed* the drive in the sda location.
I then put the mirrored drive (on sdb) in its place (into sda).   Now sdb is running in the sda slot.
I appreciate the suggestion, however, I do understand how RAID 1 works I understand what RAID 1 is.
Yes I do have messages that sdb is missing.  I can disregard those messages for the moment.  However, since it is RAID 1 at the bios level, thats probally why I'm not seeing tons of message about it missing.

My concern is I am still getting the same error.  for the device at sda.  However, it is a different device was.  I have never seen RAID 1 transfer bad sector to the mirrored drive. I don't even think that is possible since we are talking about a physical defect.  . . . . .  aren't we?

Robert Canary
OCDirect Electrical-Datacomm
(866) 594-0786 Fax
(270) 955-0362 Voice

----- Original Message -----
> Robert Canary wrote:
> > Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > Two drives sda and sdb are mirrored with RAID 1
> > Getting errors on sda.
> > I removed the sda, and moved sdb into the sda position
> >
> > However, I am still getting the same errors on the sda.
> >
> First, but based on what you've written, you really need to read up
> on
> what RAID 1 *is*.
> 
> Second, when you say you removed /dev/sda, did you take it out of the
> box,
> or just swap positions? If the latter, then a) the system still sees
> it as
> sda: that's not something you've made any changed to - the system
> will
> look for a LABEL or UUID, b) if you did take it out, and replace it
> with
> another, new, physical drive, then there will be RAID messages saying
> it's
> rebuilding, and c) if you just took it out, and there's only the one
> drive, the former /dev/sdb, you will be seeing tons of messages that
> RAID
> is degraded.
> 
>       mark
> 
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> On 07/25/12 07:18, Robert Canary wrote:
> >> > I have RHEL machine here that becomes so unresponsive the mail
> >> > server
> >> > it is hosting practically stops. It is currently running a
> >> > mirrored
> >> > drive between sda and sdb. I have been getting the following
> >> > errors
> >> > in the log files, so I moved the mirrored drive to sda and
> >> > disabled
> >> > the (old) sda. Currently the system seems to be stable again,
> >> > however, I am still getting these errors.
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you did. You mention two
> >> drives,
> >> and then "the (old) sda". ?
> >>
> >> Next, is this RAID 1?
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas where to go to fix it. Could it be bad sectors where
> >> > transferred to the mirrored drive? Running smartmontools-5.3 I
> >>
> >> No. Bad sectors are *physical* errors on the platter.
> >> <snip>
> >> 	mark
> >>
> >> --
> >>   When was the pleistocene?
> >>   Around 1.8 million years ago, til about 10K years ago.
> >>   What era are we in now?
> >>   Trouble.
> >>
> >> --
> >> redhat-list mailing list
> >> unsubscribe
> >> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >>
> >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe
> > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> 
> 
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.