Re: Defining a "Linux Engineer"

Gescape <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.general
Message-ID <1348946445.3970.5.camel@aspire>

On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 21:40 -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> Once, long ago--actually, on Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:50:17PM CDT--mark ([email protected]) said:
> > Gads, but the word "engineer" is horribly overused.
> 
> True.
> 
> > Fun facts:  Calling yourself an engineer while not being a licensed
> > professional engineer is potentially illegal, as well as can get you in
> > deep kim che for misrepresentation.
> 
> Depends on what you're using it as.  If you're trying to get a position
> that requires a PE, maybe.  Otherwise, I doubt it.
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> 	Dave Ihnat
> 	[email protected]
> 
Agree. I recently passed RHCE. Does it make me an engineer? Hmm... I
believe it depends on the point of view. Reality is it does not matter
what's on a paper. What matters really is if you can do your job really
well so the others can say "He/she really knows how to do/fix it."
I can master one technology and has no clue about the other. Am I an
engineer or not? I can pass the exam and forget most of it in 6 months.
Will I be still an engineer? ;-)

Regards,
Grzeg

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.