Re: Next L10N Meeting is Monday 11th
tiansworld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABHE_EZLsp1BpH0QJEzjvJBsyicH8SW1v2yrvFR5mD+Y5X4Hwg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft < [email protected]> wrote: Can you please confirm there is no objection in renaming cvsl10n to l10n ? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6320 > => if no objection by friday, I'll send to infra team for action. > > It's OK for me. l10n is simpler and better. > Can you please confirm there is no objection in running this cleanup? > https://pagure.io/g11n/issue/37 > => if no objection by friday, I'll send to infra team for action. > Agree to Pravin, we need further discussion on pagure. -- Regards, Tian Shixiong Fedora Project Contributor _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]