Re: Zanata statistics and what it tells about us

Benson Muite <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

In the unlikely event that the statistics are lower because of 
automation or because most of the translation has been done, perhaps 
this is a good thing! It may be good to understand which applications 
are important for the typical user and need translation. Many of these 
applications are not translated on Fedora infrastructure.

As an example, it may be worth taking a closer look at Pontoon which is 
used for Firefox. The integration with machine translation can reduce 
the time needed for translation. As web browsers are important parts of 
daily computer use, this would likely have an important influence on 
overall user experience.

Translation memory is helpful, but many platforms require this to be 
built up for each project. It would be helpful if there was a way to 
share translations between projects to allow for improved machine 
translation and translation memories - this still does require human 
input to produce a final high quality translation, but would reduce a 
lot of repetitive work. This might just be automated exchanging of po 
files, but maybe something more could be done. Software extensions that 
allow people to suggest improved translations, or indicate if a 
description is unclear would also be helpful.

Benson


On 7/11/19 12:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste wrote:
> Dear translation teams,
>
>
> our contribution statistics are going lower and lower, and if we don't 
> find the way to discuss our needs, we disappear every day a little bit 
> more and more.
>
>
> Here a the numbers, taken from a database dump provided by Carlos 
> Munoz (thanks to the help of Brian Exelbierd). The latest activity I 
> have is at 2019-06-17 07:32:20.
>
> yymm   nbUser    translated words
> 2014     12       7003
> 2015     177     984080
> 2016     248     1547032
> 2017     210     668524
> 2018     156     841206
> 2019     101     215207
>
>
> These data shows that when we had active exchanges, meetings and 
> goals, we were growing (remember we had: three events in 2015, two 
> major translation sprint in 2016 and one little translation sprint in 
> early 2017).
>
>
> My goal with the l10n meetings about the migration platform, is not to 
> debate on tool, but to discuss together on what do we need to be 
> efficient. And I'm willing to ask the council for money so we have the 
> feature we need in Weblate. But features are useless if we have no 
> process, no collective rhythm.
>
>
> I need your help, under the form of discussions and exchanges to 
> confirm or contradict my ideas about what we need.
>
>
> How to do this?
>
> * send your wishes and issues to the mailing list
>
> * come discuss on fedora-i18n
>
> * attend the next meeting
>
> * attend Flock and the l10n/i18n related talks
>
>
> Thanks for you help,
>
> Note: I can provide now quite a lot of data if required
>
> -- 
>
> Jean-Baptiste
> _______________________________________________
> trans mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
trans mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.