Re: Zanata statistics and what it tells about us
Jean-Baptiste <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 13/07/2019 à 17:13, Tiansworld a écrit : > If the migration is just because of zanata is EOL, it means there will > be another migration in the future, and another... Thanks for your feedback on previous migration. I fully agree with you. Nobody will else than us will migrate our platform, this is our responsibility to really list our issues and what we need to be resilient. > For me, the difficulties I meet are: I don't have stable connection to > zanata, also it is not good enough for coordinator to manage the > members, and the free time I have is much fewer than I'd had 10 years ago. Can you please elaborate the translation platform requirement to bypass the connection issues you're having? Does it means our translation platform should correctly handle offline contribution with file upload? About the "zanata, also it is not good enough for coordinator to manage the members", I feel like our goal should be to not need coordinator in most situation. The translation platform should allow teams to self organize and only once in a while requirement a specific rights to do something. Can you please elaborate the issues you're facing related to coordination? _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]