Re: Translation in public license with source code in GPL-2.0-or-after
Piotr Drąg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE4jGzqDwSwQdu5zkbhv2t2yATRm835fsL2bH1n4PVDuOz=-WQ@mail.gmail.com> |
czw., 9 sty 2020, 10:26 użytkownik Jean-Baptiste Holcroft < [email protected]> napisał: > Dear translators, > > ABRT dev want to have a different license for translation than the one > used for the software. > > Their software is GLP 2.0 or after. > They would like to have some kind of "Public Domain" License for > translation. > > I never had this situation before and don't know if this is acceptable > or not. > > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing > It means: "Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means > the material is not copyrighted and no license is needed." > > What do you think? > It’s absolutely unacceptable. I’m quite baffled, to be honest. What is their reasoning for this? Best, Piotr > _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]