Re: Translation in public license with source code in GPL-2.0-or-after

Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 2020-01-09 10:56, Daniel P. Berrangé a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:48:48AM +0100, Piotr Drąg wrote:
>> It’s absolutely unacceptable. I’m quite baffled, to be honest. What is
>> their reasoning for this?
> 
> Why should it be unacceptable ?

I feel like this is like saying: translation work is not part of our 
project and we don't value it as much as we value what dev do.

In addition, Fedora FPCA says if you don't know what license your are 
contributing to, you should expect your work as CC SA 3.0.

This is a protection for Fedora contributors: attribution and share 
alike.
Here, with a Public Domain, you have none of it, so a contributor could 
feel like betrayed not having a warning.

I'm in favor of including translators in application credits, the way 
GNOME does it.

Jean-Baptiste
_______________________________________________
trans mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.