Re: Translation in public license with source code in GPL-2.0-or-after
Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 2020-01-09 11:56, Daniel P. Berrangé a écrit : > If 'share alike' is something Translation team considers a requirement, > that rules out most permissive licenses. That's a valid position to > take, > but it does limit what software Fedora translation team will work with > quite a lot. > This isn't a translation team requirement, just the global mindset when you join and contribute in the Fedora community. If you know explicitly you are contributing under another mindset/rule, everything is fine. > > My key thought/point is that the real question is broader than just > "is public domain acceptable". It is about stating what subset of OSS > licenses in general are acceptable for translation work, because the > distinction between "Public domain" and other very permissive licenses > is quite minor in practice. Yes, the question is broader: is licensing translation under another license than the software itself acceptable? Jean-Baptiste _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]