Re: l10n repositories in pagure.io
Jan K <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:11:52 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PAXP193MB12145A0C1EBD7B5C95A0D936EAE19@PAXP193MB1214.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
I have commit access only to docs, should add a group access to other repos as well and someone active able to add members to that group. copperi ________________________________ From: peartown <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 4:40 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: l10n repositories in pagure.io Hello to all, I am still thinking about the state of the repositories in the fedora-l10n namespace on the pagure.io.[1] It's not that there is basically something wrong with them, but IMHO there is a danger of single-point-of-contact failure. When I realize the users with a commit access or higher are: * jibecfed (maintainer of all repositories) * asamalik * weblatebot * darknao * copperi * yaron (commit for kde) I recall when Jean-Baptiste, for example, once answered to mattdm that he didn't have time to maintain fedora-l10n/doc repository (while I think he is, in case of an urgent need, able to help with weblate's things.) asamalik is propably not more there, too. Nowadays, more or less all lays on the shoulders of darknao. And copperi is hopefully able to put some hands on as well. In this thread could we somewhat reconsider how to better organize (us) around these repositories? Would it be possible to have among the users of the repositories an account that is linked to the fedora-infra team, for example with the admin role? (I am deeply sorry for expecting all of you would have gone from the l10n matters...) Personally, I'd like to see a moment when we have "a backup of a backup". We could also reconsider if to maintain the fedora- l10n/tickets repository. We could have it as a part of fedora-l10n/docs, if we use tags for issues...? Do you have anything to propose, comment or your view in this regard? A little similar situation is with the weblate administration. By going throught this mail list I learned that the weblate admins are: * Jean-Baptiste * Piotr * Yuri * (and perhaps again) darknao Does this group needs some update, too? I have some more things to ask or propose, but let's see if we are able to come to some conclusions in these two things. Regards, Josef PS.: Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! [1] https://pagure.io/projects/fedora-l10n/%2A _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue _______________________________________________ trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue