Re: Lohit vs Noto Indic fonts
Dave Crossland <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:35:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.fonts,gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEozd0yQ2OqWGNLvdBKs+RrCTz+KprL-qJ2=9X-uvAfR+NG=SA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 4:51 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 02:39, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm the Noto product owner at Google Fonts, I expect the wider range of >> styles available by itself would make Noto fonts a better choice :) I would >> be happy to hear any aspects of Lohit that are superior >> > > Lohit follows an open source development methodology. One can provide a > patch to the sfd file. We are building from source in Fedora. > AFAIK Noto is only available in binary format. (TTF). > > But given its already used for many languages, we can definitely go ahead > for India fonts as well. > What i suggest: > 1. Lets Noto get installed by default. > 2. Lets have Lohit fontconfig priority more than Noto, so if someone > installing it manually, it will become default for particular Indian > languages. > I love it! > _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue