Re: k12ltsp as next-server - solved or almost

Jan Middelkoop <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.k12osn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Johan,

Several schools in Belgium are LTSP-powered.
http://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Linux_Systeembeheer/Linux-scholen

I think that's a far from complete list though, also it doesn't include 
the companies in Belgium that are running LTSP.

You could be the first one in Belgium using the -latest- K12Linux in a 
production environment though.

Congrats on your success!  Gefeliciteerd. ;-)

Kindest regards,

Jan Middelkoop
Recreatie en Zorg Groep B.V.

-- 
Website: http://www.recreatie-zorg.nl/
E-mail: [email protected]
Telefoon: +31 10 714 22 97


Op 08-02-12 09:46, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
> William,
>
> thanks again for the reply.
>
> I was able to log in yesterday morning by logging in to the own ip 
> address, then copying the key from /root/.ssh/known_hosts to 
> /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts.
>
> I think that's the same result as running ltsp-update-sshkeys.
>
> Thanks to your help, starting next Tuesday, we will have people doing 
> their desktop business with the help of K12Linux.
> Maybe that's a first in Belgium ??!! :-)
>
> greetings, J.
>
>
>
> Op 07-02-12 19:30, William Fragakis schreef:
>> Johan,
>> In the test environment, did the ltsp server have the same ip address or
>> was it x.x.x.254?
>>
>> If the server changes ip address, then you need to run
>> ltsp-update-sshkeys (and ltsp-update-kernels if you are using nbd
>> images).
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> William
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:00 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>>> From: Johan Vermeulen<[email protected]>
>>> To: "Support list for open source software in schools."
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [K12OSN] k12ltsp as next-server - solved or almost
>>> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>>>
>>> Hello William, hello All,
>>>
>>> I tested this again today on the production environment.
>>>
>>> 1) on the test environment, clients did log in correctly
>>>
>>> 2) I don't think it's LDAP related, mostly because root can also not
>>> log in.
>>>
>>> 3) the clients do not log in on the wrong server. I think your advise
>>> was right, they make the thinclients boot.
>>>
>>> I tested today with the two options in dhcpd.conf and ended up
>>> enabling
>>> them both, it makes no difference.
>>>
>>> so tho thinks are puzling me:
>>>
>>> * this is var/log/messages on thinclient boot :
>>>
>>> *Feb  6 16:17:05 server2 in.tftpd[9413]: tftp: client does not accept
>>> options
>>> Feb  6 16:17:24 server2 rpc.mountd[7744]: authenticated mount request
>>> from 192.168.50.148:678 for /opt/ltsp/i386 (/opt/ltsp)
>>> Feb  6 16:17:40 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: nbdswapd pid=9431
>>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148
>>> Feb  6 16:17:40 server2 nbd-server: connect from 192.168.50.148,
>>> assigned file is /var/lib/ltsp/swapfiles/QlNwyt
>>> Feb  6 16:17:40 server2 nbd-server: Size of exported file/device is
>>> 67108864
>>> Feb  6 16:17:42 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: ldminfod pid=9438
>>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148
>>> Feb  6 16:17:42 server2 xinetd[7603]: EXIT: ldminfod status=0
>>> pid=9438
>>> duration=0(sec)
>>> Feb  6 16:18:37 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: ldminfod pid=9454
>>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148
>>> Feb  6 16:18:37 server2 xinetd[7603]: EXIT: ldminfod status=0
>>> pid=9454
>>> duration=0(sec)
>>> *
>>> so I am wondering about the EXIT; ldminfod part, but I think it's not
>>> related to the problem. Or is it?
>>>
>>> * this is /var/log/secure :
>>>
>>> *Feb  6 16:11:12 server2 sshd[9228]: Accepted password for root from
>>> 192.168.50.174 port 45240 ssh2
>>> Feb  6 16:11:12 server2 sshd[9228]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session
>>> opened for user root by (uid=0)
>>> Feb  6 16:11:13 server2 sshd[9228]: Received disconnect from
>>> 192.168.50.174: 11: disconnected by user
>>> Feb  6 16:11:13 server2 sshd[9228]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session
>>> closed for user root
>>> Feb  6 16:12:59 server2 sshd[9271]: Connection closed by
>>> 192.168.50.148
>>> Feb  6 16:15:13 server2 sshd[9309]: Connection closed by
>>> 192.168.50.148
>>> Feb  6 16:18:36 server2 sshd[9443]: Connection closed by
>>> 192.168.50.148
>>> *
>>> I think this is the problem: sshd gets closed somehow.
>>> So I tried different firewall configs, but to no avail. Also turned
>>> off
>>> Selinux, that's not it, either.
>>> I also checked /etc/ssh/sshd_config to make shure  to have pam=on.
>>>
>>> So I think it has to do with sshd, but cannot figure out what.
>>>
>>> greetings, J.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> K12OSN mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>> For more info see<http://www.k12os.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>

_______________________________________________
K12OSN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.