Re: k12ltsp as next-server - solved or almost
Jan Middelkoop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.k12osn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Johan, Several schools in Belgium are LTSP-powered. http://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Linux_Systeembeheer/Linux-scholen I think that's a far from complete list though, also it doesn't include the companies in Belgium that are running LTSP. You could be the first one in Belgium using the -latest- K12Linux in a production environment though. Congrats on your success! Gefeliciteerd. ;-) Kindest regards, Jan Middelkoop Recreatie en Zorg Groep B.V. -- Website: http://www.recreatie-zorg.nl/ E-mail: [email protected] Telefoon: +31 10 714 22 97 Op 08-02-12 09:46, Johan Vermeulen schreef: > William, > > thanks again for the reply. > > I was able to log in yesterday morning by logging in to the own ip > address, then copying the key from /root/.ssh/known_hosts to > /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts. > > I think that's the same result as running ltsp-update-sshkeys. > > Thanks to your help, starting next Tuesday, we will have people doing > their desktop business with the help of K12Linux. > Maybe that's a first in Belgium ??!! :-) > > greetings, J. > > > > Op 07-02-12 19:30, William Fragakis schreef: >> Johan, >> In the test environment, did the ltsp server have the same ip address or >> was it x.x.x.254? >> >> If the server changes ip address, then you need to run >> ltsp-update-sshkeys (and ltsp-update-kernels if you are using nbd >> images). >> >> Hope this helps, >> William >> >> >> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:00 -0500, [email protected] wrote: >>> From: Johan Vermeulen<[email protected]> >>> To: "Support list for open source software in schools." >>> <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [K12OSN] k12ltsp as next-server - solved or almost >>> Message-ID:<[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" >>> >>> Hello William, hello All, >>> >>> I tested this again today on the production environment. >>> >>> 1) on the test environment, clients did log in correctly >>> >>> 2) I don't think it's LDAP related, mostly because root can also not >>> log in. >>> >>> 3) the clients do not log in on the wrong server. I think your advise >>> was right, they make the thinclients boot. >>> >>> I tested today with the two options in dhcpd.conf and ended up >>> enabling >>> them both, it makes no difference. >>> >>> so tho thinks are puzling me: >>> >>> * this is var/log/messages on thinclient boot : >>> >>> *Feb 6 16:17:05 server2 in.tftpd[9413]: tftp: client does not accept >>> options >>> Feb 6 16:17:24 server2 rpc.mountd[7744]: authenticated mount request >>> from 192.168.50.148:678 for /opt/ltsp/i386 (/opt/ltsp) >>> Feb 6 16:17:40 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: nbdswapd pid=9431 >>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148 >>> Feb 6 16:17:40 server2 nbd-server: connect from 192.168.50.148, >>> assigned file is /var/lib/ltsp/swapfiles/QlNwyt >>> Feb 6 16:17:40 server2 nbd-server: Size of exported file/device is >>> 67108864 >>> Feb 6 16:17:42 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: ldminfod pid=9438 >>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148 >>> Feb 6 16:17:42 server2 xinetd[7603]: EXIT: ldminfod status=0 >>> pid=9438 >>> duration=0(sec) >>> Feb 6 16:18:37 server2 xinetd[7603]: START: ldminfod pid=9454 >>> from=::ffff:192.168.50.148 >>> Feb 6 16:18:37 server2 xinetd[7603]: EXIT: ldminfod status=0 >>> pid=9454 >>> duration=0(sec) >>> * >>> so I am wondering about the EXIT; ldminfod part, but I think it's not >>> related to the problem. Or is it? >>> >>> * this is /var/log/secure : >>> >>> *Feb 6 16:11:12 server2 sshd[9228]: Accepted password for root from >>> 192.168.50.174 port 45240 ssh2 >>> Feb 6 16:11:12 server2 sshd[9228]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session >>> opened for user root by (uid=0) >>> Feb 6 16:11:13 server2 sshd[9228]: Received disconnect from >>> 192.168.50.174: 11: disconnected by user >>> Feb 6 16:11:13 server2 sshd[9228]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session >>> closed for user root >>> Feb 6 16:12:59 server2 sshd[9271]: Connection closed by >>> 192.168.50.148 >>> Feb 6 16:15:13 server2 sshd[9309]: Connection closed by >>> 192.168.50.148 >>> Feb 6 16:18:36 server2 sshd[9443]: Connection closed by >>> 192.168.50.148 >>> * >>> I think this is the problem: sshd gets closed somehow. >>> So I tried different firewall configs, but to no avail. Also turned >>> off >>> Selinux, that's not it, either. >>> I also checked /etc/ssh/sshd_config to make shure to have pam=on. >>> >>> So I think it has to do with sshd, but cannot figure out what. >>> >>> greetings, J. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> K12OSN mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn >> For more info see<http://www.k12os.org> > > _______________________________________________ > K12OSN mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn > For more info see <http://www.k12os.org> _______________________________________________ K12OSN mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>