Re: TC wifi initializtion - concept

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:50:50 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.k12osn
Message-ID <CAOAgVpzOiZRDCcPQ1B5Mig7MR=tBbkMnF469ZB_Ep5TiF+SsNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Roger Nutbeam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Freenx is a lot better performing than X over wireless. I haven't had the
> chance to test x2go but from what I've looked it so far, I like what I see.

X2go uses some of the same nx libraries as freenx and unlike NX the
clients are also open source.  At least on CentOS6 freenx and x2go
packages can co-exist if you want to try both, although they don't
interoperate.  X2go seems to have more active development now and
seems pretty usable.   I think a USB-boot into something that just
opened an x2go window might be a practical thin client - but I haven't
run a large number of clients against the same server.  There is
probably some overhead for the virtual sceen/cache/compression for
each session.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     [email protected]

_______________________________________________
K12OSN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>