Re: Very slow Fedora 22 installation
Mrinmoy Roy <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:46:53 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.kickstart.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAZ0pS4_hXvwSSE35D4C7NwWZU-6fVxGFDxG6=v7qx7GBNMXnQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, Can you tell me which .iso are you using for Fedora 22..? Thanks On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Roderick Johnstone <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I'm currently running a Fedora 22 kickstart install to one of our backup > servers. Its been running for nearly a day now! > > The root partition is on ext4 but there is a btrfs file system on top of > md raid6 that holds our user backups. Each users' files are rsycned to the > btrfs filesystem and then a snapshot made, so there are many thousands of > snapshots. > > Currently the install has been running for nearly a day (the main screen > is full of dots). Behind the scenes the installer seems to be working its > way through all the snapshots with messages like this in storage.log: > > 05:11:42,844 INFO blivet: hiding device existing 9.1 TiB btrfs snapshot > home_xxx/20130423-000501 (59677) with existing btrfs filesystem > 05:11:42,848 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB > 05:11:42,852 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB > 05:11:42,857 DEBUG blivet: BTRFSVolumeDevice.removeChild: kids: 32903 ; > name: btrfs.133 ; > 05:11:42,858 INFO blivet: removed btrfs snapshot home_xxx/20130423-000501 > (id 59677) from device tree > 05:11:42,858 DEBUG blivet: lvm filter: adding home_xxx/20130423-000501 to > the reject list > 05:11:43,540 DEBUG blivet: existing RAID raid6 size == 9.1 TiB > > In my kickstart file I have a (legacy) line which I use to make sure that > there is no possibility of the install happening to the wrong device: > ignoredisk --only-use=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST380815AS_9RA8ZRZK > > where ata-ST380815AS_9RA8ZRZK is the disk I want to install the operating > system to. > > Is it possible that this is whats causing the slowness? > > I guess I could remove the ignoredisk line now since I use the by-id name > to identify the disk to install to in the 'part' commands. I think we > introduced 'ignoredisk' ages ago when we had to specify partitions by names > like /dev/hda1 and I was caught out once when the disks were enumerated in > a different order in the installer than in the previous operating system I > was using and the install happened to the wrong device. > > I'm disinclined to interrupt the install at the moment, as it does seem to > be making progress, but confirmation that removing the 'ignoredisk' line > would avoid the issue I described would be useful. > > Thanks > > Roderick Johnstone > > _______________________________________________ > Kickstart-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list > _______________________________________________ Kickstart-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list