RE: RHAS LVS Gaps

"Ey That is the Rub", it isn't in the docs.  I couldn't find anything in the docs about changing the configuration of a running lvs/piranha and making those changes take effect, only setting up your first one.  

The best resource I have found so far for this stuff is this list.

Thanks,
Robin Greenhagen
GSI
http://www.gsi-kc.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Burke [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RHAS LVS Gaps


Where specifically in the docs did you see this misinformation?  Let's 
get it corrected.....

Greenhagen, Robin wrote:

>OK, after another hour of head banging I have uncovered the answer to my original question a.  
>
>To make changes to lvs take effect without killing existing connections, the correct command with RHAS is:
>
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/pulse reload  NOT  /etc/rc.d/init.d/pulse restart
>
>I guess instead of RTFM it should be RTFS (S=script)
>
>Thanks for the lead Mike.
>
>Robin Greenhagen
>GSI
>http://www.gsi-kc.com/
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike McLean [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:09 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: RHAS LVS Gaps
>
>
>Greenhagen, Robin wrote:
>
>>a.  How do I make a change in the lvs.cf file take effect?  
>>
> > I tried to do /etc/rc.d/init.d/pulse restart, but that didn't seem to 
>do it.
>
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/pulse restart *should* work.  If you have two directors 
>you will need to manually copy the lvs.cf over and restart both.
>
>
>>b.    If REALSERVER B is in "Standby", it  essentially sends all the traffic 
>>
>to REALSERVER A
> > unless REALSERVER A dies, and then it activates
>
>You may want to look into Piranha's FOS mode, or you might look into 
>Clumanager.  OTOH, Alex's suggestion (weight 10000 vs. 1) may suffice.
>
>If you want to request that this feature be added, then submit a bug at 
>bugzilla.redhat.com with severity="enhancement".
>
>
>>c.  I noticed that the ipvsadm is quite a bit older that the ones at 
>>
>linuxvirtualserver.org
>
>Red Hat often chooses the tried&true over the latest&greatest for 
>stabilility reasons.  Our kernel version is a bit lower than the latest 
>one at kernel.org, too. ;-)
>
>
>> Is this a dead product at RedHat?
>>
>
>No
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Piranha-list mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Piranha-list mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
>





_______________________________________________
Piranha-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list