Re: Director Failover

Hi BMan,

I've read about questions raised on connection
synchronization between the primary and backup
director in the lvs mailing list. I suppose that means
existing connection can be maintained during director
failover. Does that means connection synchronization
is achieved in other software but not Piranha ?

During my test with piranha, I noticed the telnet
session is still on shortly after the director
failover but went dead eventually. How do you explain
this observation ?

Thanks
Chee Chye

 --- BMan <[email protected]> wrote: > The
existing telnet connection will be disconnected
> because Piranha 
> (regardless of routing method used)  does not track
> session state.  The 
> same holds true for ssh, ftp and similar services.
> 
> Regards,
> BMan
> 
> ong cheechye wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm testing Piranha+Direct routing with telnet
> service
> >using a primary director and a backup director
> which
> >is also acting as a realserver (due to shortage of
> >machines). 
> >
> >I telnet from another machine to the VIP. I then
> stop
> >the pulse in the primary director and the backup
> >director take over. Would the existing telnet
> >connection be disconnected ?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Chee Chye
> >  
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Promote your business from just $5 a month!
> >http://sg.biztools.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Piranha-list mailing list
> >[email protected]
>
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Promote your business from just $5 a month!
http://sg.biztools.yahoo.com