Re: apparent routing problem
"Stephen Spalding" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <seae75aa.041@groupwise> |
Will there be any kind of PREROUTING statement to go along with it? Also, I've been using 'modprobe iptables' after reboot to load the iptables kernel modules. Is this something that I should go ahead and put into /etc/rc.d/rc.local? Are there any other commands that I need to be aware of? The install doc that I got with piranha isn't real clear on iptables. >>> [email protected] 04/29/03 08:50AM >>> Nope.. It will assume the route of the root interface. A rule of thumb, NEVER edit interfaces controlled by piranha.. Saves lots of headaches! P "Stephen Spalding" <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the line read: > > -A POSTROUTING -o eth0:1 -j MASQUERADE > or > -A POSTROUTING -o 10.0.3.132 -j MASQUERADE > > to signify the VIP address? > > >>> [email protected] 04/29/03 08:32AM >>> > Right... Is it returning a page to the browser at all, or are you > looking in > the logs or tcpdump to find out what it hits? > > This will MASQUERADE outgoing packets with the virtual IP: > > -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > > If this line is not there, the machine will not let packets go back to > the > client. To my knowledge, IPVS is NOT stateful, so it will not route > outgoing > packets on it own. The firewall must do this. > > Let me know- > > P > > > > > "Stephen Spalding" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've already got the default route of the real servers set to > > 10.0.1.254. > > > > Again, the problem is that I can only see the real servers from one > > server on my internal network which just happens to have an internet > > interface. I'm pretty sure that it is going through the load balancer > to > > get there as every time I hit refresh on the browser it chooses a > > different real server. > > > > >>> [email protected] 04/28/03 08:05AM >>> > > > I figured it was something like that. What would the syntax of my > > > iptables command be if on my lvs router if it was configured like > > this: > > > > > > virtual server: 10.0.3.132 > > > eth0: 10.0.3.133 > > > eth1: 10.0.1.6 > > > nat router: 10.0.1.254 > > > > There's no iptables need, ipvs *is* masquerading your traffic. You > > just > > need to set the default route thru the director on the realservers : > > > > route add default gw 10.0.1.254 > > > > The permanent way to do that is to edit /etc/sysconfig/network and > set > > GATEWAY=10.0.1.254 > > > _________________________________________________________ > This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piranha-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piranha-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list > _________________________________________________________ This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org _______________________________________________ Piranha-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list