RE: High Availability Samba file Server- Piranha FOS+DRBD
"Sumesh" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry, I am not clear. Can I understand that , at the moment I can't go for Piranha FOS for a HA Samba Fileserver failover solution ? Kindly clarify Thanks®ards Sumesh -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Edward Croft Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:42 PM To: Piranha List Subject: Re: High Availability Samba file Server- Piranha FOS+DRBD On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 06:32, Sumesh wrote: > Hi all, > > I am asked to offer a Solution High Availability for Samba File Server in RedHat 8.0 or 9.0 > Can I go for Piranha FOS ( for providing failover) and Data Replication softwares like DRBD or > Rsync( For common data availability). > > Kindly advise me on this and let me know if there is any issue with Samba and Piranha FOS. > > Earliest help would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks &Regards, > Sumesh > Hi, Sumesh, I just set up piranha for failover on postgres, firewalls, and application servers. Note that out of the box, you cannot run scripts when using FOS. FOS is very basic, however, Sebastion Bonnet has some patches that allow FOS to handle failover using scripts the same as LVS currently does. Just a caveat to be aware of. Aside to Sebastion, have you submitted these to Red Hat for addition? If not, would you mind if I forwarded the diffs to Red Hat for review? It would be nice if this feature was built in for the future. (Though I think RH may be abandoning piranha for its clumanager.) _______________________________________________ Piranha-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list