NAT question
Brian Lalor <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:21:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Good afternoon, all. I've been reading through the documentation for
setting up an LVS environment, both with the piranha interface to the
lvs.cf file and also on the LVS site. Both sites are leaving me
hanging.
First off, I'm using RHAS2.1 and am trying to provide high availability
and load balancing for an Oracle Collaboration Suite installation. It
looks like, including the two LVS systems (if I can ever get them
working) I'll have eight machines total: two DB, two Infrastructure
(active/passive failover with RHCM), two mid-tier (active/active for
smtp, http, ftp, smb, imap, pop, etc. and active/passive for the Oracle
Calendar component) and two LVS directors in an active/passive
configuration. I would really rather use LVS-DR, but that's not a
supported configuration in RHAS and I can't get around the "arp
problem" without resorting to patching the kernel myself (which I
really don't want to do, again for support reasons).
The documentation on the RH site seems to assume that you're starting
with a fresh install of RHAS on the director and real-server, and walks
you through configuration of LVS once the cables are run. I've
successfully configured my director to send SSH traffic to a single
real-server, but the problem I'm having is that the real-server cannot
contact the outside network. Let's take the basic LVS-NAT layout:
________
| |
| client | (local or on internet)
|________| 192.168.25.23
|
(router)
|
-- |
L Virtual IP (192.168.25.213)
i ____|_____
n | | (director can have 1 or 2 NICs)
u | director | 192.168.25.91
x |__________|
| 10.1.99.10 (virtual) / 10.1.99.1 (fixed)
V |
i |
r ----------------------------------
t | | |
u | | |
a | | |
l _____________ _____________ _____________
| | | | | |
S | realserver1 | | realserver2 | | realserver3 |
e |_____________| |_____________| |_____________|
r (10.1.98.1) (10.1.98.2) (10.1.98.3)
v
e
r
---
The IP address of a single client is 192.168.25.23. The virtual IP of
the director is 192.168.25.213 (which can be taken over by a not-shown
second director for failover purposes). The "real" IP of the director
is 192.168.25.91 (this IP is assigned to the machine and does not
move). This network is 192.268.25.0/24.
Now, on the "internal" network, 10.1.99.10 is the virtual IP of the
director (again held by the active director in a two-director
configuration), 10.1.99.1 is the "real" IP of the director in the
internal network, and 10.1.98.1, ..., .3 are the IPs of the real
servers.
At this point, I can establish, for example, an SSH connection to the
virtual IP 192.168.25.213 and have it directed to realserver1, but
realserver1 cannot get anywhere else on the network. It seems to me
that I need to configure the director to masquerade traffic from the
real-servers to the rest of the network without impacting the LVS
component of the director. This is not covered anywhere in the
documentation, however! Is it as simple as configuring vanilla IP
masquerading on the director completely separate from LVS? I would
guess not since there seems to be iptables configuration necessary to
handle firewall marks.
Did I miss a section of the documentation somewhere, or is that all
left as an exercise for the reader? HELP!
Thanks,
B
--
Brian Lalor
Web Portal Analyst
Delta Faucet Co.
[email protected]
(v) 317-573-3461