RE: 2 Real Servers & 2 Directors with only 2 machines

"Wilson, Dave" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:16:41 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.piranha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We use piranha in fos mode quite extensively, so it is somewhat disturbing
to hear that it has been deprecated.  We do also use Cluster Manager, but
not all the HA configs we use have shared disks, which rules out using CM.
Unless there is a way of using Cluster Manager without shared disks?

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike McLean [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 3:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 2 Real Servers & 2 Directors with only 2 machines
> 
> 
> Edward Croft wrote:
> > Greg, with Sebastien's permission, I submitted his changes 
> to Red Hat,
> > but I think that they have all but abandoned piranha in 
> favor of Cluster
> > Manager. Shame too, since piranha seems to work fairly well for
> > failover. 
> 
> Not abandoned.  Piranha has two modes, FOS and LVS.  When Cluster 
> Manager was added to the distro, we had two different products for 
> failover.  Since Cluster Manager is superior in the failover 
> department 
> it became the preferred solution and Piranha's FOS mode 
> became deprecated.
> 
> However, Piranha's LVS mode (which really is its main 
> feature) is still 
> the preferred way to perform load balancing.  Failover 
> between the two 
> directors is also still supported.
> 
> I cannot find an RFE in bugzilla regarding the failover script patch. 
> If this applies to director failover I will consider putting it in.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
>