Re: AW: may be problem on NAT?

Well i dont understand so much

....

i create a bond0 on the servers, but what ip?....

can u explain much please :( and if u can... can u make an example?

A lot of tanks!


> Hi,
>
> i also had some troubles to create a two nodes LVS Cluster. Currently
> i'm using the direct routing method on two nodes. I made two bonding
> interfaces in the same ip subsegment. Why you aren't using the same -
> direct routing - method, or is there any matter that you have to use
> the NAT method?
>
> If you are using the Direct Routing Method you must to enter an
> iptables rulte on the real-sever interface. in my case that was the
> bond0 interface.
>
> E.G: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i bond0 or eth0/1 -p tcp -d
> 193.144.34.ZZZ --dport 80(what application is running on the Real
> Servers?) -j REDIRECT
>
> I hope this summary is useful for you!
>
> Regards,
> Philipp
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Alejandro
> Feijoo Gesendet: Montag, 6. März 2006 16:50
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: may be problem on NAT?
>
>
> I want to create a cluster using piranha but i only have 2 servers, one
> for
>    LVS router, one for LVS backup and both for Real Servers.
>    The conf is the follow:
>
>    ProliantA:
>    public ip: 193.144.34.XXX
>    private ip 10.1.1.1
>    virtual public ip: 193.144.34.ZZZ
>    virtual private ip: 10.1.1.3
>    ProliantB:
>    public ip: 193.144.34.YYY
>    private ip 10.1.1.2
>
>
>    I run piranha and make the following config:
>    serial_no = 143
>    primary = 193.144.34.XXX
>
>
>    primary_private = 10.1.1.1
>    service = lvs
>    backup_active = 1
>    backup = 193.144.34.YYY
>    backup_private = 10.1.1.2
>    heartbeat = 1
>    heartbeat_port = 539
>    keepalive = 6
>    deadtime = 18
>    network = nat
>    nat_router = 10.1.1.3 eth1:1
>    nat_nmask = 255.255.255.240
>    debug_level = NONE
>    monitor_links = 1
>    virtual WEB {
>         active = 1
>         address = 193.144.34.ZZZ eth0:1
>         vip_nmask = 255.255.255.0
>         port = 80
>         send = "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n"
>         expect = "HTTP"
>         use_regex = 0
>         load_monitor = ruptime
>         scheduler = rr
>         protocol = tcp
>         timeout = 6
>         reentry = 15
>         quiesce_server = 0
>         server proliantA {
>             address = 10.1.1.1
>             active = 1
>             weight = 2000
>         }
>         server proliantB {
>             address = 10.1.1.2
>             active = 1
>             weight = 1000
>         }
>    }
>
>
>    But the result is, nat not work... because when i active pulse on
>    both servers eth0:1 not start propietly and... if any petition to
>    193.144.34.ZZZ    may pass to other server this service not work
>
>
>    any can help me?
>
>
>    Tanks! and sorry my english
>
> ++-------------------------++
> Alejandro Feijóo Fraga
> Tecnico de Sistemas.
> Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
> Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Sur.
> 15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
> Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension: 216
> Fax: 981 59 46 16
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list



++-------------------------++
Alejandro Feijóo Fraga
Tecnico de Sistemas.
Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Sur.
15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension: 216
Fax: 981 59 46 16