Re: weight problem

--===============1534102585==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1380766.1BoXjIBjQW";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1380766.1BoXjIBjQW
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

The beahivor improveed, but isn't the expected (I changed the algorithm and=
=20
raised the weight):

TCP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 wrr persistent 2700
  -> 172.16.42.124:80             Masq    1      17          951
  -> 172.16.41.15:80              Masq    5000   221        3215

grep "29/Jul/2009:15:23" access_log.2009-07-29 | grep -v "172.16.42.15" |wc=
 -l
408

grep "29/Jul/2009:15:23" access_log.2009-07-29 | wc -l
1677

Cumprimentos,
=46ernando Gomes

On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Mike Kemelmakher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thats because you choose  "rr"  scheduling algorithm  - which is not aware
> of weight parameter
> try to change it to  wlc or wrr  and see what you get
>
> -Mike
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Fernando A. P. Gomes=20
<[email protected]>wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  I've configured lvs to give diferent weight to my virtual servers:
> >
> >     server s1 {
> >         address =3D 172.16.42.15
> >         active =3D 1
> >         weight =3D 1000
> >     }
> >     server s2 {
> >         address =3D 172.16.42.124
> >         active =3D 1
> >         weight =3D 1
> >     }
> >
> > However, the the ipvs list of connections give me this:
> >
> > TCP  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 rr persistent 2700
> >  -> 172.16.42.124:80            Masq    1           24        2674
> >  -> 172.16.41.15:80              Masq    1000   400        2159
> >
> > And an access count with the apache logs gives me this:
> >
> > s1 (172.16.41.15):
> > grep "29/Jul/2009:14:23" access_log.2009-07-29 | wc -l
> > 1054
> > s2 (172.16.42.124):
> > grep "29/Jul/2009:14:23" access_log.2009-07-29 | wc -l
> > 1380
> >
> > I've more accesses to s2, that have a lower weight than s1, and the ipvs
> > connection list should be 1000 to 1.
> >
> > Can anybody comment?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Fernando Gomes
> > --
> > Fernando Alexandre Peixoto Gomes <[email protected]>
> > Eurotux Inform=E1tica, S.A. [http://eurotux.com]
> > Rua Rosalvo de Almeida, 5. 4710-429 BRAGA PORTUGAL
> > Tel: (+351) 253 257395 - Fax: (+351) 253 257396
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Piranha-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
=2D-=20
=46ernando Alexandre Peixoto Gomes <[email protected]>
Eurotux Inform=E1tica, S.A. [http://eurotux.com]
Rua Rosalvo de Almeida, 5. 4710-429 BRAGA PORTUGAL
Tel: (+351) 253 257395 - Fax: (+351) 253 257396


--nextPart1380766.1BoXjIBjQW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBKcFwjoLZrxCZCn6oRAk07AJ9Qf7xze0UTDAfc/4frzmvqsLvfKACgpr3t
nUmobBkmfE9nXrXmdEb3ZFQ=
=IE4c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1380766.1BoXjIBjQW--


--===============1534102585==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Piranha-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
--===============1534102585==--