Re: mail and html

> > They are correct for more reasons than just asthetics. HTML can carry
> > dangerous code. Better to send your stuff in .pdf attachments.
> 
> *gag*
> talk about gross inefficiency.
> 
> run a pdf converter/generator for every outgoing mail?
> force the reader to have or get acrobat reader?
> force the reader to wait for acrobate reader to fire up?
> 
> my customers would spit on me as I walked by if I tried to sell them that
> scenario as the best way they could serve their customers.

If you were really worried about your customers, your gateway wouldn't
have nearly so many open ports as it does. Priorities....

And wrong. Customers and clients actually depend on us to show them
how to do things in a manner that's not going to cost them a lot of $$ if
they contract a virus or trojan (like the subseven one running on your
gateway box).

This little piece of info was free. Next time, you pay, okay?