Re: Adding a disk to a RAID array
"Elizabeth R Martin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.enigma |
|---|---|
| Organization | UT-Houston Medical School |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stewart, Unfortunately, this solution creates a whole different set of issues. Because of the sensitive nature, defined by other people than myself and higher up the food chain, the security issues that I have with the one box would then propagate to the new one thus doubling the headaches I already have with the first box. Lets just say that in the near future I have to move the box from my server room to a special secure area in to the "Fort Knox" room two floors below me. Elizabeth Martin "Stewart M. Ives" wrote: > Elizabeth, > > I'm going to tell you the same thing I said before. > > Put 2 cheap BIG (100+GB) IDE drives in the box. Let Linux do the RAID for > you, software RAID. Once this is up, move all the data from the old data > partition over to the new dataNEW partition. Rename the old partition to > dataOLD and rename the new partition from dataNEW to data. There. Problem > solved. > > One last thing. For backup, put a BIG IDE drive in another cheap cheap > cheap old old old system unit, load linux on it, put it on the network, and > do your backups first to this sytem and then to tape. Then you will > basically have on-line backup in the event of a data drive failure or > someone deleted that oh-so-important file (probably their resume). > > Good luck. > > stew > > [email protected] wrote: > > Bill, > > > > Yeah, that is what I was hoping for. I wish I was lucky enough to be > > able to have the funds to have another system that I could test the > > process out on. However, being a state funded institution most funds > > go to medical research and education and I get what's left over and > > have to do the best I can with that. Unfortunately the data > > partition is what I need raided the most. Research data and faculty > > teaching information is contained there. I have people who freak out > > big time when there is a network problem and can't access the box - > > they are banging at my door wanting to make sure that their data > > hasn't been lost. Looks like I am going to have to take a whole new > > look at the process of what I need to do. I may even plan upgrading > > to RH8 and upgrading the RAID controller card to one recommended by > > Adaptec to replace the one I have as well as replacing the drives > > with larger ones even though I have 4 matched drives already and hope > > I can get the funds. Like I need all of this headache with all I am > > being required to do now in order to get all of my systems compliant > > with Federal and State regulations like HIPAA etc. I am going to > > have to lock myself in my office to plan out the next couple of > > months just to keep current with the have to do's. > > > > Elizabeth Martin > > > > Bill Gradwohl wrote: > > > >> So you are trying to expand an existing array. Lots of older > >> controllers had no way to expand an existing array. Those that did > >> claim to do so failed under many conditions. Very recent controllers > >> are much improved, but that's not a description of DPT. > >> > >> You are more trusting than I am. Candidly, even if I had the manual > >> in hand I wouldn't try to expand a RAID array on a production box > >> unless I could test it out first on the EXACT same hardware in a > >> test environment. > >> > >> Have you considered, and does the controller BIOS support, just > >> adding a non RAID drive to the controller and using it all by itself > >> in a non RAID fashion? Even that is risky because you don't know > >> what the controllers BIOS will do with it. I had one controller > >> (can't remember which, but it was IDE) step on the array at boot up. > >> No chance to take evasive action. > >> > >> If you are running SCSI drives, does that also mean you have a > >> second controller for a tape drive? Not a second channel, but a > >> whole new controller that's already in the same box. How about > >> spinning that drive up on the separate controller. > >> > >> As you can see, I'm trying to do anything but touch the array > >> because what the books say will work many times don't. > >> > >> Bill Gradwohl > >> [email protected] > >> (817) 224-9400 x211 > >> www.ycc.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> enigma-list mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > --- > Outgoing SofTEC USA mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 3/10/2003 > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list
Elizabeth.R.Martin.vcf
(text/x-vcard, 471 B)
begin:vcard n:Martin;Elizabeth R. E. tel;pager:(713) 716-4002 tel;fax:(713) 500-7455 tel;work:(713) 500-7518 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:UT-Houston Medical School;Integrative Biology & Pharmacology version:2.1 email;internet:[email protected] title:Network Support Specialist III adr;quoted-printable:;;Department of Integrative Biology & Pharmacology=0D=0A6431 Fannin MSB 5.117;Houston;Texas;77030;USA x-mozilla-cpt:;29856 fn:Elizabeth R. E. Martin end:vcard