Re: upgrading to RHL7.3
"Keith Mastin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.enigma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Just want to get the lists overall view of upgrading from RHL7.1 to > RHL7.3. In the past I've always rebuilt the server, I'm wondering what > the groups input on upgrading within version (ex from 7.1 to 7.3) vs > upgrading from version to version ex:7.1 to 8.0 or even 9.0. Standard rule of thumb is unless you have an overwhelming reason to upgrade a server, it should be left alone. When that reason exists, there are a number of factors that come into play: -what services will the machine run? -are those services available on the upgrade? -what changes to existing configs will be necessary? I stayed away from 8.0 as RH changed the configs around a lot, renaming stuff, etc. They also made it gui heavy, which is of absolutely no use to me. The only compelling reason I would have to upgrade is performance gains resulting from the 3.x compiler, which were not compelling enough to undertake, so I stuck with 7.3. -- Keith Mastin BeechTree Information Technology Services Inc. Toronto, Canada (416)696 6070