Re: 7.2 Install of SO52 Problems

On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 12:38:19PM -0700, FrankK wrote:
> I need a way to repair libstu569li.so after it gets "dented" by depmod -ae.
> Note here that I am replying to my own original post to add more
> information.

I don't have a clue about libstu569li.so. where does it come from?

however, I DO have a clue regarding the CDROM problem in a vanilla
RH72 install. This is a bug in the original 7.2. RH issued an errata
for it shortly after releasing 7.2 (as well as big bunches of other
important fixes too!).

I suggest that you register for a demo account at RHN (or buy an
account) then run up2date to do a full update of all errata for your
system. (if you've got some kind of broadband connection it won't be
too painful, but since there are a HUGE number of updates, if you're
stuck on a modem it'll be pretty painful, but nevertheless you ought
to do it because there are many security -- as well as bug -- fixes).

> 
> Regards, FrankK
> 
> Details Follow:
> 
> I am now convinced that this SO52 install problem was caused by my prior
> invocation as root of depmod -ae. That invocation was necessitated by the CD
> drive not being recognized by the kernel as a valid block device - which I
> also posted.
> 
> This is a catch 22 situation for a virgin install where the CD drive is not
> properly recognized. The remedy to fix the drive problem renders
> libstu569li.so unusable for Star Office 5.2 CD install.
> 
> To prove my conclusion to myself I completed loaded the 7.2 OS twice. The
> first time I ran depmod -ae and copied the SO52 bin files to an ext2
> partition that I didn't format on the second install.
> 
> With the second install I had a virgin libstu569li.so for SO52 to use. It
> installed flawlessly. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of FrankK
> Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 6:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 7.2 Install of SO52 Problems
> 
> 
> 
> Are staroffice 5.2 install problems on RH7.2 acceptable here?
> 
> If so I have a library and a font problem I would appreciate some help with.
> 
> The library problem is fatal - the first time I've seen it. The font problem
> I have lived with on previous installs.
> 
> This is fresh 7.2 server install followed by the staroffice 5.2 network
> install. The network install directory is /usr1/office52. /usr1 is 550 MB
> and empty. Messages from the root shell and user shell follow.
> 
> Regards, FrankK
> 
> As root:
> 
>  6:12PM[1666] /mnt/cdrom/english/so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin /net
> glibc version: 2.2.4
> Failed to load font
> "-ult1mo-arial-medium-r-normal--14-0-0-0-p-*-adobe-fontspecific"
> Please verify your fontpath settings
>         (See "man xset" for details or ask your system administrator)
>   error:  invalid compressed (deflated) data for libstu569li.so
> 
> As myself:
> 
> 6:27PM[1670] /usr1/office52/program/setup  
> /usr1/office52/program/setup.bin: error while loading shared libraries:
> libsot569li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enigma-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enigma-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- [email protected] -----------------------------
                    The Lord detests the way of the wicked 
                  but he loves those who pursue righteousness.
----------------------------- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) -----------------------------