Re:enigma-list digest, Vol 1 #1783 - 12 msgs
"carlosthomaz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.enigma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for those who answered my question! I´ll be testing my environment during this week. Tks again, carlos thomaz. > Send enigma-list mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more s pecific > than "Re: Contents of enigma-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Warning when running up2date - u ([email protected]) > 2. RE: Warning when running up2date -u (Stewart M. Ives) > 3. RE: Warning when running up2date - u ([email protected]) > 4. RE: Warning when running up2date - u ([email protected]) > 5. red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9-21 (carlosthomaz) > 6. RE: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9- 21 (Winston Gutkowski) > 7. Re: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9- 21 (Eric Koldeweij) > 8. netmeeting (Jon Miller) > 9. mount fat (Suprotip Ghosh) > 10. Re: mount fat (Tony Nugent) > 11. errata (System) > 12. Using my machine as gateway... (System) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Subject: Warning when running up2date -u > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:14:53 -0400 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Is this something I should be concerned about? > > Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... > ######################################## > LPRng-3.7.4-28.2.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > arts-2.2.2-7.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > libpcap-0.6.2-17.7.2.2.i386 ########################## Done. > man-1.5j-7.7x.0.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > micq-0.4.10.2-1.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > xinetd-2.3.11-1.7x.i386.rpm ########################## Done. > zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > zlib-devel-1.1.4-8.7x.i386. ########################## Done. > Preparing... ################################ ########### > [100%] > > Installing... > 1:zlib ################################ ########### > [100%] > 2:LPRng warning: /etc/lpd.conf created a s > /etc/lpd.conf.rpmnew > ########################################### [100%] > 3:arts ################################ ########### > [100%] > 4:libpcap ################################ ########### > [100%] > 5:man ################################ ########### > [100%] > 6:micq ################################ ########### > [100%] > 7:xinetd ################################ ########### > [100%] > 8:zlib- devel ########################################### > [100%] > The following Packages were marked to be skipped by your con figuration: > > Pat Spatola > Unix Administrator > Berkley Technology Services > 302-439-2006 > [email protected] > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e- mail and the transmitted documents contain > private, privileged and confidential information belonging t o the sender. > The information therein is solely for the use of the address ee. If your > receipt of this transmission has occurred as the result of a n error, please > immediately notify us so we can arrange for the return of th e documents. > In such circumstances, you are advised that you may not disc lose, copy, > distribute or take any other action in reliance on the infor mation > transmitted. > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "Stewart M. Ives" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Warning when running up2date -u > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:30:43 -0400 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > The answer is no. > > Sounds like you need to hire someone familiar w linux. > > stew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 1:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Warning when running up2date -u > > > Is this something I should be concerned about? > > Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... > ######################################## > LPRng-3.7.4-28.2.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > arts-2.2.2-7.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > libpcap-0.6.2-17.7.2.2.i386 ########################## Done. > man-1.5j-7.7x.0.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > micq-0.4.10.2-1.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > xinetd-2.3.11-1.7x.i386.rpm ########################## Done. > zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > zlib-devel-1.1.4-8.7x.i386. ########################## Done. > Preparing... > ########################################### > [100%] > > Installing... > 1:zlib > ########################################### > [100%] > 2:LPRng warning: /etc/lpd.conf created a s > /etc/lpd.conf.rpmnew > ########################################### [100%] > 3:arts > ########################################### > [100%] > 4:libpcap > ########################################### > [100%] > 5:man > ########################################### > [100%] > 6:micq > ########################################### > [100%] > 7:xinetd > ########################################### > [100%] > 8:zlib-devel > ########################################### > [100%] > The following Packages were marked to be skipped by your > configuration: > > Pat Spatola > Unix Administrator > Berkley Technology Services > 302-439-2006 > [email protected] > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e- mail and the transmitted documents > contain > private, privileged and confidential information belonging t o the > sender. > The information therein is solely for the use of the address ee. > If your > receipt of this transmission has occurred as the result of a n > error, please > immediately notify us so we can arrange for the return of th e > documents. > In such circumstances, you are advised that you may not disc lose, > copy, > distribute or take any other action in reliance on the > information > transmitted. > > > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > --- > Outgoing SofTEC USA mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 - Release Date: 5/13/2003 > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 02:39:00 +0900 (JST) > Subject: RE: Warning when running up2date -u > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > > > The answer is no. > > > > Sounds like you need to hire someone familiar w linux. > > No, he can rtfm first, > > I recommend: > > rtfm://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9- Manual/security-guide/ > rtfm://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/admin- primer/ > > In this situation, I recommend that you visit > > http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/ > > and upgrade *only* redhat told you to do. > > good luck > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: RE: Warning when running up2date -u > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:43:21 -0400 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > In these tough economic times.... Appreciate the help thou gh.... > > Thanks, > > Pat Spatola > Unix Administrator > Berkley Technology Services > 302-439-2006 > [email protected] > > > > "Stewart M. Ives" > <ivessm@softecusa To: <en igma- [email protected]> > .com> cc: > Sent by: Subject: RE: Warning when running up2date - u > enigma-list- admin > @redhat.com > > > 05/15/2003 01:30 > PM > Please respond to > enigma- list > > > > > > > > The answer is no. > > Sounds like you need to hire someone familiar w linux. > > stew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 1:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Warning when running up2date -u > > > Is this something I should be concerned about? > > Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... > ######################################## > LPRng-3.7.4-28.2.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > arts-2.2.2-7.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > libpcap-0.6.2-17.7.2.2.i386 ########################## Done. > man-1.5j-7.7x.0.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > micq-0.4.10.2-1.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > xinetd-2.3.11-1.7x.i386.rpm ########################## Done. > zlib-1.1.4-8.7x.i386.rpm: ########################## Done. > zlib-devel-1.1.4-8.7x.i386. ########################## Done. > Preparing... > ########################################### > [100%] > > Installing... > 1:zlib > ########################################### > [100%] > 2:LPRng warning: /etc/lpd.conf created a s > /etc/lpd.conf.rpmnew > ########################################### [100%] > 3:arts > ########################################### > [100%] > 4:libpcap > ########################################### > [100%] > 5:man > ########################################### > [100%] > 6:micq > ########################################### > [100%] > 7:xinetd > ########################################### > [100%] > 8:zlib-devel > ########################################### > [100%] > The following Packages were marked to be skipped by your > configuration: > > Pat Spatola > Unix Administrator > Berkley Technology Services > 302-439-2006 > [email protected] > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e- mail and the transmitted documents > contain > private, privileged and confidential information belonging t o the > sender. > The information therein is solely for the use of the address ee. > If your > receipt of this transmission has occurred as the result of a n > error, please > immediately notify us so we can arrange for the return of th e > documents. > In such circumstances, you are advised that you may not disc lose, > copy, > distribute or take any other action in reliance on the > information > transmitted. > > > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > --- > Outgoing SofTEC USA mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 - Release Date: 5/13/2003 > > > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e- mail and the transmitted documents contain > private, privileged and confidential information belonging t o the sender. > The information therein is solely for the use of the address ee. If your > receipt of this transmission has occurred as the result of a n error, please > immediately notify us so we can arrange for the return of th e documents. > In such circumstances, you are advised that you may not disc lose, copy, > distribute or take any other action in reliance on the infor mation > transmitted. > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:01:53 -0300 > Subject: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9-21 > From: "carlosthomaz" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Hi all... > > I need to install the red hat 7.2 with > kernel level 2.4.9-21 or OLDER. > The application is only supported on > this version. > > What's the easiest way in doing this?! > I've been looking for the CD images > but I couldn't find... > > I appreciate any help... > > C Thomaz. > > Just another question: Does anyone has > tried to install red hat 7.2 with in a > Dual processor server with adaptec's > SCSI-320 board? > > > --- > UOL, o melhor da Internet > http://www.uol.com.br/ > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: "Winston Gutkowski" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9-21 > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 18:26:09 -0700 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > The version of 7.2 that we downloaded a while ago was 2.4.7- 10. > I expect we could send you the kernel RPM (s) if that would help. > Probably need to check with others to determine exactly whic h ones you need. > > Winston > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of carlosthomaz > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 17:02 > To: [email protected] > Subject: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9-21 > > > Hi all... > > I need to install the red hat 7.2 with > kernel level 2.4.9-21 or OLDER. > The application is only supported on > this version. > > What's the easiest way in doing this?! > I've been looking for the CD images > but I couldn't find... > > I appreciate any help... > > C Thomaz. > > Just another question: Does anyone has > tried to install red hat 7.2 with in a > Dual processor server with adaptec's > SCSI-320 board? > > > --- > UOL, o melhor da Internet > http://www.uol.com.br/ > > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:55:03 +0200 > From: Eric Koldeweij <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: red hat 7.2 dist. with kernel 2.4.9-21 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Just install it from the original CDs. It contains kernel 2. 4.7-10. > > Look at http://www.redhat.com/mirrors for a mirror, there ar e lots of > sites still having 7.2 available. > I know for example ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/mirror/redha t/linux has them > > Eric. > > carlosthomaz wrote: > > >Hi all... > > > >I need to install the red hat 7.2 with > >kernel level 2.4.9-21 or OLDER. > >The application is only supported on > >this version. > > > >What's the easiest way in doing this?! > >I've been looking for the CD images > >but I couldn't find... > > > >I appreciate any help... > > > >C Thomaz. > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:56:38 +0800 > From: "Jon Miller" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: netmeeting > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Like to know if anyone has been able to get netmeeting to wo rk over the internet both voice and video. trying to establis h connections with both the us and the uk. > > thanks > > > Jon L. Miller, MCNE, CNS > Director/Sr Systems Consultant > MMT Networks Pty Ltd > http://www.mmtnetworks.com.au > > "I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure > is trying to please everybody." -Bill Cosby > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: 16 May 2003 13:30:59 -0000 > From: "Suprotip Ghosh" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: mount fat > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Newbie Q... > > How do I mount my Windows partitions on Red Hat 7.2? > > mount -l, -t; ln /dev/hda1/ etc. ain't givin' any results... > > the startup log says while loading other filesystems, "no > mountpoints defined". > > 'funny thing': Mandrake generally mounts fat automatically.. .!? > > thanx all u gurus out there...in advance... > > > ___________________________________________________ > Impress your clients! Send mail from me @ mycompany.com . > Just Rs.1499/year. > Click http://www.rediffmailpro.com to know more. > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > To: "Redhat 7. 2 Enigma Mailing List" <enigma- [email protected]> > From: Tony Nugent <[email protected]> > Organization: Linux Works > Subject: Re: mount fat > Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:12:26 +1000 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > On Fri May 16 2003 at 13:30, "Suprotip Ghosh" wrote: > > > Newbie Q... > > > > How do I mount my Windows partitions on Red Hat 7.2? > > A relatively trivial task... > > > mount -l, - t; ln /dev/hda1/ etc. ain't givin' any results... > > That is _not_ the way it is done. Try it like this: > > mkdir /mnt/dos > mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/dos > ls -l /mnt/dos > > > the startup log says while loading other filesystems, "no > > mountpoints defined". > > What's the contents of your /etc/fstab file? > > > 'funny thing': Mandrake generally mounts fat automatically ...!? > > *linux* can mount fat partitions automatically - if it is configured > correctly. There would be nothing special about what Mandra ke (or > any other linux distro) does. > > > thanx all u gurus out there...in advance... > > Put something like this into fstab... > > /dev/hda1 /mnt/dos vfat defaults 0 0 > > Now all you have to do is "mount /mnt/dos" and it is done. > > I actually use this: > > /dev/hda1 /mnt/dos vfat noauto,uid=0,gid=0,fmask=644,dmask=755 0 0 > > (Change the uid and gid to suit if you need user access. Th e fmask > and dmask make the filesystem permissions a bit more "sensib le" than > the defaults). > > This can also be done "magically" with automount (autofs), b ut that > would be a bit too advanced to explain here. > > Cheers > Tony > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > From: "System" <[email protected]> > To: "Enigma" <[email protected]> > Subject: errata > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 19:34:45 +0530 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > I am not able to access > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh72-errata- security.html from last two days. > Is is accessible to others? > > Tina... > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > From: "System" <[email protected]> > To: "Enigma" <[email protected]> > Subject: Using my machine as gateway... > Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:03:58 +0530 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > I am using RH7.2 on linux box. I have two network card confi gured as > > 1. eth0 192.168.1.101 > 2. eth1 10.0.0.1 > 3. DSL Gateway 192.168.1.1 > > All my client machine are configured with IP range 10.0.0.*. Instead of > using proxy I want to use 10.0.0.1 as a gateway for all my m achines to > access internet. How do I? > > Thank you, > > Tina... > > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > enigma-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enigma-list > > > End of enigma-list Digest > --- UOL, o melhor da Internet http://www.uol.com.br/