Re: does new vmware workstation beta 3.2 work with (null)?
"Kashif Ali" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002101c25be3$1943c210$ee2c98d5@skynet> |
i can install it as a guestos on the vmeware gsx server but it doesnt seem to be ableto ruin on the GSX server as the host OS, i installed and everything but it has someproblem withthe kenel,must be something i did, but will se when vesion shios Kashif ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark C" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 12:07 PM Subject: Re: does new vmware workstation beta 3.2 work with (null)? > On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 11:37, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote: > > Running 3.2 beta on null seems to work fine. Just started with it > > yesterday. I had to edit the module sources to change the include > > of malloc.h to slab.h in order to be able to create new modules. > > mine compiled fine, with now alterations at all (errors flew by, but it > still compiled) > > > I tried it with windows 98 aqs guiest os. Installation and initial > > startup worked fine. However when I changed the resolution from > > 640x480 to 800x600 or 1024x768 some strange thing happened. I do not > > see any text anymore in the windows. Don't know if this is > > cased by windows or vmware though. Actually I started with > > vmware 3.0 getting this problem. Upgrading to 3.1 and 3.2 did > > not fix this. > Mines seem to be running fine, I've installed Win2k server, NT 4 server > and workstations and all seems fine, even running at 1024x768 > > > > I also noticed that when the guest os is running the total > > CPU load on the system gets to 100%. Is this normal? > > Not sure if it should run that high, but its probably about right, seen > as its always been cpu/memory hungry anyway > > Mark > > -- > --- > To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; > to steal from many is research. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Limbo-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list >