Re: How much patching?
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat Inc. |
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209142302030.18225-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> |
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Barry K. Nathan wrote: >Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:04:38 -0700 >From: Barry K. Nathan <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >List-Id: Discussion of the Red Hat Linux 'Limbo' beta > <limbo-list.redhat.com> >Subject: Re: How much patching? > >On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote: >> I believe the only distributor that provides an upatched kernel is >> Slackware. > >I believe Debian does as well, and while Mandrake's default kernel is >patched, they also provide RPM packages for unpatched kernels. I don't believe any popular mainstream Linux distribution ships a kernel that is unpatched. The stock kernels are a good baseline generally, but they're definitely not perfect. Red Hat, and most if not all other Linux distributors patch the stock Linus kernels with various bug fixes, stability patches, per-architecture patches that never made it into Linus's stock kernel yet, performance tuning, and selected other items. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer XFree86 maintainer Red Hat Inc.