Re: Assessing USB Mass Storage devices
Thomas Dodd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark C wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 19:54, Thomas Dodd wrote: > > >>Those 2 suggest it's not acting as a USB mass storage device. >>Check the USB list <[email protected]> or the >>kernel-list <[email protected]> for more. >> >>It might be a bug in the USB layer, but it probably a device bug. > > > When you mean device bug, do you mean a bud in the actual camera > transfer process within the camera its self? I'm thinking the camera doesn;t support the USB Mass Storage spec correctly/completely. The Windoze drivers do the real work, and the camera is incorrectly telling the USB subsystem it is a UMS device, since it appears not to be. The USB guys would know more. There is a Verbose debug option for USB Mass Storage (CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG) but you have to recompile the mmodule for it. There are some sub drivers already, and this may require one. Either a new one of adding the device to the support list for and older one + tweaks. -Thomas