Re: Assessing USB Mass Storage devices - Debugging Info
Thomas Dodd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark C wrote: > Hi (again) > > I have now compiled linux-2.4.19-ac2 with USB Mass Storage degugging > Information. A must for any debugging work :) > If anyone can make some sence of this, I would be very gratefull for any > more assistance :-) > usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0x12 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 255 F 128 CL > 6 > usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0 > usb-storage: usb_stor_transfer_partial(): xfer 255 bytes > usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_msg() returned -32 xferred 0/255 > usb-storage: clearing endpoint halt for pipe 0xc0038280 > usb-storage: usb_stor_clear_halt: result=0 > usb-storage: usb_stor_transfer_partial(): unknown error That doesn't look promissing... > usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0 > usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0x12 R 0 Stat 0x0 > usb-storage: -- Result from auto-sense is 0 > usb-storage: -- code: 0x70, key: 0x5, ASC: 0x24, ASCQ: 0x0 > usb-storage: Illegal Request: invalid field in CDB Same here. could just be the WP (write protect?) test failing. > usb-storage: Command READ_10 (10 bytes) Read 10 bytes. > sda1 Looks like it found a partition table there. but it wasn't read by fdisk later... > I will be doing some more searching on some of the information for > dmesg, but to be honest most of it baffles me, as its kernel debugging > output. Same here. I'm not "in the know" with the lowlevel USB details. > I will be posting this to both then usb and kernel mailing lists to try > to get some more information. I'm still on the kernel list. I watch there for futher info. -Thomas