Re: Assessing USB Mass Storage devices - Debugging Info

Thomas Dodd <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Mark C wrote:
> Hi (again)
> 
> I have now compiled linux-2.4.19-ac2 with USB Mass Storage degugging
> Information.

A must for any debugging work :)

> If anyone can make some sence of this, I would be very gratefull for any
> more assistance :-)

> usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0x12 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 255 F 128 CL
> 6
> usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
> usb-storage: usb_stor_transfer_partial(): xfer 255 bytes
> usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_msg() returned -32 xferred 0/255
> usb-storage: clearing endpoint halt for pipe 0xc0038280
> usb-storage: usb_stor_clear_halt: result=0
> usb-storage: usb_stor_transfer_partial(): unknown error

That doesn't look promissing...

> usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
> usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0x12 R 0 Stat 0x0
> usb-storage: -- Result from auto-sense is 0
> usb-storage: -- code: 0x70, key: 0x5, ASC: 0x24, ASCQ: 0x0
> usb-storage: Illegal Request: invalid field in CDB

Same here. could just be the WP (write protect?)
test failing.

> usb-storage: Command READ_10 (10 bytes)

Read 10 bytes.
>  sda1
Looks like it found a partition table there.
but it wasn't read by fdisk later...

> I will be doing some more searching on some of the information for
> dmesg, but to be honest most of it baffles me, as its kernel debugging
> output.

Same here. I'm not "in the know" with the lowlevel USB details.

> I will be posting this to both then usb and kernel mailing lists to try
> to get some more information.

I'm still on the kernel list. I watch there for futher info.

	-Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.