RE: possible gnome-terminal/vte DoS?
Jef Spaleta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1032398872.6691.5.camel@goober> |
well wouldnt think to check bash's man page if the file in question is actually owned by the pam package...that's just not a logical place to search for documentation. So I guess the rule of thumb is when in doubt read bash's manpage? Conf files are only self-documenting to a point and a quick reading limits.conf...its not clear that its part of pam...so its really not clear from the comments in the example file what subsystem really uses this file...and where to look for english sentences and explanations. Not everyone can parse sparse reference comments in conf file examples and wrap their heads around what's going on. I wouldn't call the comments in limits.conf documentation...more like notes... -jef On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 20:37, Dax Kelson wrote: > On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 18:22, Jef Spaleta wrote: > > indeed it is...documentation for that little would be even more useful > > How about: > > $ less /etc/security/limits.conf > > Or 'man bash' search for 'ulimit'. > > > You have to delve into the /usr/share/doc/ to get a hint of what that > > file is for. > > Not true, see above. > > You are correct, a man page should be written. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Limbo-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9iSgYrWLDmRitRZURAtA6AKCluzKy0Qofwh2g1U09Ui3XP3rc9ACfXAKV DkL0tYeLb7pRNhtMrd91riY= =8SR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----