Re: UI design [was Owen Taylor's paper]
Thomas Dodd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 12:12, Jef Spaleta wrote: > >>So how do you successfully balance choice compared to consistency? >>Ripping out all the kde native apps is certainly too much to sacrifice >> > > > The developers of the major DTEs need to adopt common standards. Those > standards should respect the point that about 95% of users of desktop > computers run Windows, and so differ from Windows only when there's a clearly > good reason to do so. I've seldom seen a reason to follow windows as an example of anything good. > Not everything about Windows is good, I don't think the basic design of the > Windows UI is the best around, but the fact is that most people most likely > to come to Linux are currently using Windows. So what about those of us who came to Linux from somewhere else? Just change it, and make *US* relearn things? I know where the dialogs are on the apps I use, and I know what they are for. Nowe you want to change that, to copy some "standard" M$ set? I like the fact that not every app in Linux looks/acts the same. One of the few things I dislike about OpenOffice.org is the attempt to clone the M$ way of doing things. -Thomas