Re: UI design [was Owen Taylor's paper]

Thomas Dodd <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo
Message-ID <[email protected]>

John wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 12:12, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> 
>>So how do you successfully balance choice compared to consistency?
>>Ripping out all the kde native apps is certainly too much to sacrifice
>>
> 
> 
> The developers of the major DTEs need to adopt common standards. Those 
> standards should respect the point that about 95% of users of desktop 
> computers run Windows, and so differ from Windows only when there's a clearly 
> good reason to do so.
I've seldom seen a reason to follow windows as an example
of anything good.

> Not everything about Windows is good, I don't think the basic design of the 
> Windows UI is the best around, but the fact is that most people most likely 
> to come to Linux are currently using Windows.

So what about those of us who came to Linux from somewhere else?

Just change it, and make *US* relearn things?
I know where the dialogs are on the apps I use, and I know what
they are for. Nowe you want to change that, to copy some "standard"
M$ set?

I like the fact that not every app in Linux looks/acts the same.
One of the few things I dislike about OpenOffice.org is
the attempt to clone the M$ way of doing things.

	-Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.