RE: Hyperthreading & 8.0

Warren Togami <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo
Message-ID <1032836706.1392.181.camel@laptop>
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 15:05, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> Is there any reason why dual Athlon MPs won't "hyperthread"? I could be
> wrong, but I thought late model Athlons have multiple instruction
> pipelines. Superscalar or something like that. How different is that
> from what Intel is promising?
> 
> --Doc Savage

I think even with superscalar architecture it still wastes many cycles
within the multiple execution pipelines during wait states (e.g. waiting
for the much slower system RAM or other off-chip devices).  I believe
hyperthreading has two sets of registers on chip rather than just one,
allowing for execution of another task during these otherwise wasted CPU
cycles.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.