Re: Rationale for package removals
Thom Paine <[email protected]> 25 Sep 2002 09:36:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 03:15, Paul Gear wrote: > [WARNING: Contains rant. Apologies in advance for my grumpy tone.] > > Having had a look at > <ftp://ftp.eu.uu.net/pub/linux/redhat/linux/8.0/en/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES.html>, > > i find myself wondering whether it is even worth participating in this > mailing list. Does Red Hat pay any attention to our discussions here? > In the release notes i found this: > > The following packages have been removed from this release of Red Hat > Linux: > > * alien > * auth_ldap > * blt > * dip > * fvwm2 > * elm > * extace > * glms > * gnomeicu > * gnome-pim > * gnorpm > * gphoto > * gq > * ical > * jikes > * kaffe > * kontrol-panel > * metamail > * micq > * mm > * mod_auth_any > * mod_bandwidth > * mod_dav > * mod_put > * mod_roaming > * mod_throttle > * netscape > * playmidi > * pump > * rpmfind > * rpmlint > * rxvt > * sliplogin > * smpeg > * smpeg-xmms > * snavigator > * taper > * xbill > * xdaliclock > * xlockmore > * xmailbox > * xpilot > > > A number of these were discussed here previously, but the list is > substantially longer now than it was for the (null) beta - much of it > presumably as the result of an apache package reorganisation - but still > not even a word about why the packages were removed or what the > alternatives are. > > What does it take to get some useful information about this? Buying an > RHN subscription? A personal letter to Michael Tiemann? :-/ Not that I would know, but some of it may not work 100% under 8.0. It could have been removed and may be readded later. I'm sure there will be more news from redhat on it. -- -=/>Thom Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux Kernel 2.4.18-10 Uptime: 9:34am up 4 days, 19:40, 3 users, load average: 1.27, 1.29, 1.27 Registered Linux User #214499 http://counter.li.org