Re: It is indeed, a very sad day...

I am also a long time KDE user.

I think I can live with just about anything, but it's good to have a
consistency. I used to be an fvwm user and when fvwm (one) is taken off
of Redhat, I have to use something else because my old .fvwmrc would
work with fvwm2.

I hope my personal kde settings would work just fine without much
tweaking when I upgraded my 7.3 to 8.0. 
I wouldn't be happy learning new desktop behavior, key bindings, etc.

I remember when I had to deal with a shortcut that means save and exit
on one app, and force kill terminal on the other. I lost some unsaved
codes. Not fun.


On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 13:56, Jens Knutson wrote:
> 
> --- Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I don't need a hundred
> > settings and knobs somewhere deep in the configuration menus.
> 
> And yet you use KDE? ;-)
> 
> sorry, I couldn't resist...
> 
> Actually, I'm guessing you're right - the vast majority of Red Hat
> users won't notice much of a difference.  I don't like the ugly, large
> bottom panel, ala KDE and Windows that Red Hat made the default even
> for GNOME, but you don't hear me screaming.  I just accept that
> consistency is more important than petty quibbles, delete the panel,
> add a menu panel, and I'm happy.  No big deal.
> 
>  - jck
> 
> =====
> "Outlook not so good."  Wow, that magic 8-ball knows everything!  I'll ask about Exchange Server next...
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Limbo-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list