Re: Gnome Desktop Only

Jef Spaleta <[email protected]> 27 Sep 2002 09:24:58 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo
Message-ID <1033133130.9031.40.camel@spatula>
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:31, Eric Hartwell wrote:
> as long as they provide the ability to have and use an app (or suite of apps 
> as the case may be) and do not dimish the functionaility of those said apps 
> in RedHat's distro, then all is well. As soon as Linux people see that RH 
> doesnt want them to run certain (and common) programs, they'll bolt. and RH 
> will suffer. 

So you interpret having a slim set of default applications in the
default menus as Redhat not wanting people to run certain applications? 
I don't see that when I see the default menus...but then again as a
linux person I tweak the crap out of any defaults I find no matter what
the look like to begin with

Are you trying to say that the idea of a limited set of default
applications in a fresh install is a bad idea?  You would rather have
Redhat dump ALL the choices for every type of application out there in 
the menus for people to work their way through?  The UI obsessed people
would have your head on a spike for such ideas.

What about this:
What if Redhat added a first time walk through slideshow dialog that
points out to new installs that the Redhat default menus provide a slim
set of default applications for common tasks and indeed the application
choices provided by Redhat are not limited to just the applications
listed in the standard menus..and the menus can be customized for
personal preference. Would that change the impression that Redhat was
taking away choice?
  
-jef
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9lFwqrWLDmRitRZURAvsCAKCTRHl900sbWQkbQGFCBe6+SQ3LhgCgpdwR
iLdiWpPXcStVvLpJ3Y7Uq5A=
=h0fF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----